Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

only marginally significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
In this SEM, there are significant relationships between some socio-demographic variables and the distance from the mining operation site ( Table 2 ): larger households tend to be found further away from the mine (β = 1.08±0.22, P<0.001) and community members who have been residing for longer period in the MKLM are also found further away from the mine, but this relationship is only marginally significant (β = 0.04±0.02, P = 0.079).
of borderline significancep = 0.0791.6× alpha
The higher risk of infection in siblings remained significant when controlling for other case and contact variables in multivariable models; greater transmissibility associated with vomiting was of borderline significance when accounting for other index case characteristics (OR = 2.50, p = 0.079) as well as in the full models accounting for contact characteristics (OR = 2.42, p = 0.135).
marginally significantP = 0.0791.6× alphagold
(5) This change in BR resulted in a marginally significant decline in bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) along the DOC gradient (r 2 = 0.30, F 1,10 = 3.94, P = 0.079, Fig. 8c ): (6) Discussion In this study, we evaluated a commercially available source of humic substances (Super Hume) for studying the effects of terrestrial DOC on the chemistry, physics, and biology of aquatic ecosystems.
a statistical trendp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Post hoc univariate analyses showed that females (n = 163) scored significantly higher than males (n = 162) in the EC subscale (M f = 28.63 vs M m = 25.77; F 1,320 = 10.472; p<0.005), and a statistical trend in the same direction was observed in the PD subscale (M f = 19.32 vs M m = 17.44; F 1,320 = 3.108; p = 0.079), while there were no differences in the PT subscale (M f = 25.89 vs M m = 24.12; F 1,320 = 1.165; p = 0.281) and in the FS subscale (M f = 24.49 vs M m = 22.45; F 1,320 = 2.368; p = 0.125; Figure 1 ).
borderline significantp = 0.0791.6× alphagold
Detailed analyses of the previously associated SNPs rs1024611 and rs2857656 demonstrated a borderline significant association in the Guinea-Bissau population for rs1024611 under the dominant model (AA (referent) versus AG & GG, OR = 1.36, 95% CI [0.96–1.93], p = 0.079) ( Table 3 ).
borderline significancep = 0.0791.6× alpha
All other parameters significantly associated with prognosis in univariate analysis did not influence the overall survival when evaluated by multivariate analysis, except for the T status (P = 0.01), while the histological pattern reached only a borderline significance (p = 0.079) ( Table 5 ).