55 years, p = 0.02), and a marginally significant higher percentage were undergoing dialysis before their most current admission that led to VAP (22% vs. 10%, p = 0.08).
Excerpts
citri The cumulative adult psyllid-days was negatively related to flush shoot hardness ( y = 2.63–1.7 x , df = 1, 2; R 2 = 0.84), albeit marginally significant ( P = 0.08) ( S1 Fig ).
Results Pre-experiment ratings As expected, participants found the android to be significantly less humanlike ( M android = 4.32, M control = 7.42, t (37) = 8.89, p <0.0001, d = −1.44), and felt less comfortable viewing his videos than those of the control (marginally significant two-tailed t-test: M android = 4.11, M control = 4.68, t (37) = 1.83, p = 0.08, d = 0.29).
Increases in subsequent intervals were smaller, but resulted in an almost significant increase in length between 40° and 120° (9% over combined intervals; p = 0.08 after Bonferroni Correction).
showed a trendP = 0.08
Western blot analysis of pSmad 2 expression showed a trend towards increased expression in diabetic mice, which was ameliorated to some extent by linagliptin (P = 0.08)( Fig 4B ).
showed a trendp = 0.08
Our results showed a trend toward a 4% increase in the NAA/tCr ratio between sham and tDCS conditions ( p = 0.08, Cohen’s d = 0.52) and no significant changes in any other metabolite ratios ( Fig 3 , Table 2 ).
approached significancep = 0.08
The correlation between the traders' 2D∶4D and their Sharpe Ratios, however, while displaying the expected sign, only approached significance at the 5% level (n = 47, r = −0.26, p = 0.08).
close to significanceP = .08
The negative PPI from the averaged frontal regions to the temporal region was significant between LM and NM [t (30) = −2.1, P<.05], close to significance between HM and NM [t (30) = −1.8, P = .08], and significant when HM and LM were averaged [t (30) = −2.1, P<.05].
There was a marginally significant positive association between perceived binding foundations and favorability ( B = .03, SE = .02, t (202) = 1.77, p = .08).
There was a marginally significant main effect of the preceding trial type [ F (1, 17) = 3.45, p = .08, η 2 = .03], a significant main effect of the FA type [ F (1, 17) = 15.00, p = .001, η 2 = .10], and a significant interaction between two factors [ F (1, 17) = 24.359, p < .001, η 2 = .20].
marginally non-significantp = 0.08
marina treatment, although the differences were marginally non-significant (z = 1.76, p = 0.08, z = 1.82, p = 0.07; respectively; see Fig 1A ).
Furthermore, PostC also improved diastolic function, indicated by reduced LV end-diastolic pressure and a blunted reduction of dp/dt min, although the latter effect was only marginally significant (p=0.08).
showed a trendp = 0.08
42 [56.8%] of 74, p = 0.004, and showed a trend towards being more likely to have normal cognition at entry (4 (18.2%) of 22 vs. 30 (40.5%) of 74, p = 0.08).
showed a trendp = 0.08
IFN-γ-concentrations showed a trend (combination vs. mNOX-E36, p = 0.08; combination vs.
Whereas increased deaths from all leukaemia and all solid cancers are indicated, with hazard ratios (HR) approaching significance, (p = 0.08 and p = 0.26, respectively) the relative risk of death from non-cancer was markedly reduced in the male patients treated with radium compared to controls (HR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.72–0.91; p = <0.001).
With a main effect of groups ( F (3,50) = 9.685, p < .0001; η 2 = 0.91), post hoc comparisons using Dunnett’s T3 procedure showed that although no VSA difference was apparent between the SNHL and NH groups ( F (1, 31) = 6.172, p = .080), both the COND and MIX groups exhibited significantly more compressed VSAs than the NH group did (NH vs COND: F (1, 35) = 20.736, p = .002; NH vs MIX: F (1, 34) = 13.965, p = .010).
showed a trendp = 0.08
Androstadienone showed a trend toward increasing the attention of older adults to subliminal emotional faces, particularly angry ones ( Fig 1 , overall trend p = 0.08) as it had in younger adults [ 24 ].
However, there was a nonsignificant trend linking fear of crime with muscularity estimates r (45) = .27, p <.08.
of marginal significancep = 0.08
DUT was significantly associated with smoking (p = 0.01), HELZ was of marginal significance with alcohol (p = 0.08), and although smokers had lower HELZ expression than never smokers as with RNAseq, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.34).
Although the mean difference between causally related and unrelated words (1.97μV) was larger than the mean difference between causally related and hierarchically related words (1.49μV), only marginally significant difference was found between causally related and unrelated words ( p = .08).
borderline significancep = 0.08
Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a significant difference between groups of high and low let-7b expression in BCR (log rank p = 0.01), while let-7c showed borderline significance (log rank p = 0.08) ( Fig. 4A ).
A positive trend was found between child and maternal reading engagement scores (p = 0.08).
showed a trendp = 0.08
Similar analysis of GAD67 contact with VGluT1 terminals showed a trend towards reduction in animals with spasticity (1.8±0.1 in control vs. 1.2±0.06 in ischemic-spastic; p = 0.08).
The small-world clustering ( Fig 3D , left) for the positive edges showed a significant difference between CNT and MCS and a fairly significant difference (p=0.08) between CNT and UWS, but failed to distinguish between MCS and UWS, and the same for the negative edges, where it could only differentiate between CNT and UWS.
The ANOVA on P3 revealed a marginally significant main effect of prime type, F (1, 17) = 3.28, p = 0.08, η p 2 = 0.16, with a greater P3 amplitude for the strongly masked no-go trials ( M = 7.94 μV, SD = 0.91) than that for the strongly masked go trials ( M = 7.56 μV, SD = 0.88).