Excerpts

In addition, 31% of corals from Butaritari (N = 13) had partial mortality scars associated with the 2004 bleaching event, while none from Abaiang and North Tarawa showed such scars (N = 12); this difference was marginally significant (p = 0.10, permutation test).

In the univariate analysis, there was a clear trend towards an increased risk of infection in the 6 months following rituximab (odds ratio: 1.51, 95% CI [0.90–2.56], p = 0.1).

In the independent analyses for AML patients and MDS patients, beneficial effects on OS by the donor G/G or A/G genotype were also found, which was close to being significant in both the AML patients (adjusted HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.42–1.09; P = 0.10) and the MDS patients (adjusted HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.35–1.08; P = 0.09).

Using a similar model, there was a similar direction of effect with a trend towards significance in Cohort 3 (p = 0.1).

Heterozygosity excess was significant (p<0.05) for the Wilcoxon test in all cases, except for the Western Cantabrian subpopulation without migrants, for which it was only marginally significant (p<0.1).

Factors that were significant and nearly significant (P<0.1) were included in univariate analysis.

Aside from one coefficient, marginally significant at the (p<0.1) level, there appears to be no systematic response to children victims.

In addition, there were no significant associations of SNP with BMI ( Table 2 ) or with the probability of being overweight or obese ( Table 3 ), though rs266729 in ADIPOQ and rs7975600 in ADIPOR2 had a borderline significant association with the probability of being overweight (OR = 1.31, 95% CI: 0.95, 1.79, p = 0.10 and OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.51, 1.06, p = 0.10, respectively) and rs2232853 with the probability of being obese (OR = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.99, 2.61, p = 0.05).

The KM plots were used to re-evaluate all of the previously tested binomials and polynomials demonstrating significant (p < .05) or borderline significant results (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10).

This revealed no significant differences in either males (all P ≥ 0.05) or females (all P > 0.6), though responses at 800–1000 μA approached significance in males (0.05 < P < 0.10).

The overall regression models were significant in eight cases and showed a trend ( p <.10) towards significance in another two cases.

Variables that reached borderline significance (p<0.1) in the univariate analysis were considered for inclusion into the multivariate models.

Another nine (7%) analyses were only marginally significant (i.e., p < .10) in the expected direction.

Results and analysis Effect of dietary concentrate/crude ratio on yak growth performance As shown in Table 2 , final body weight exhibited an increasing trend with higher concentrate feed inclusion ( P > 0.10).

While no significant differences were observed by microarray between healthy and arresting trophoblast, miR-148b verged on significance (p<0.10), and was assessed by Real-Time PCR but the results did not significantly differ.

Healthy trophoblast expressed 1 miRNA, miR-148b , which approached significance (p<0.10), at a higher level than arresting trophoblast.

In the following we report only significant, or near-significant results from the ANOVA (p<0.1); for all results see Table 1 .

We also included any factors which were marginally significant (0.05 <p-value<0.10), which we considered as potential meaningful risk factors.

Greenfinches ( Carduelis chloris ) and tree sparrows also showed higher population densities in 2010 but differences were only marginally significant ( P <0.10; Fig. 4 ).

Subjectively, those with “borderline significance” (p<0.10) were included.

In addition, two other pathways (MAPK signaling and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum) approached significance ( P < 0.1).

In the subliminal condition, the N1 enhancement for naked OSS compared to naked SSS only showed a statistical trend towards significance (t(18) = −1.39, p >.1).

Those variables that were significant or nearly significant (i.e., p <.10, two-tailed test) in the initial ANOVAs presented above were used in subsequent analyses.

The correlation between maternal affect and externalising problems approached significance, with more positive affect correlating with fewer externalising problems ( p <.10).

While most of the interaction terms in Model 4 were not statistically significant, their presence in the model rendered the beta for days of rationing marginally significant ( p <0.10) and proportion of vegetated land cover statistically significant ( p <0.01), thus lending initial, though weak, support to hypothesis 2 that increased rationing was associated with increased sachet use.