The differences in the proportion of identified heterospecific song types between sympatric and allopatric Thrush Nightingale males were highly significant (GLM, DF1 = 1, DF2 = 15, F = 25.94, p = 0.00013), as was the difference in the proportion of Common Nightingale song types in repertoires of sympatric Thrush Nightingale and Common Nightingale males (GLM, DF1 = 1, DF2 = 15, F = 14.56, p = 0.0016).
Excerpts
These effects on theta power included: a highly significant reduction at frontal sites (p = 1.55×10 −4 ) and a marginally significant reduction at parietal sites (p = 0.0499) in Sp4 hypomorphic animals, as well as a slight but significant increase at occipital sites (p = 0.0203) in wildtype animals ( Fig 4B ).
When all absolute raw ITVs (900) were correlated with respective area values a highly significant inverse relationship was observed ( r = - 0.125, p = 0.000169).
A t-test was also performed to validate significant enrichment of repetitive elements in the intergenic regions which gave a highly significant p-value for the enrichment of repetitive elements in the intergenic regions (p-value = 0.0001957 in S . tuberosum and p-value = 6.018e-11 in S . lycopersicum ).
approached significance-Log(p-value) = 3.7
The false negative chemical mefenamic acid approached significance (-Log(p-value) = 3.7) and exhibited a pattern in which all but one of the 11 altered genes were directionally consistent with the biomarker.
A highly significant positive correlation was observed across groups between the levels of Aβ-IgG immune complexes in CSF and serum ( r = 0.54, p = 0.0002; Figure S2 in the Supporting Information).
The size of this effect was reflected in a highly significant group-level difference between Probe and Irrelevant (P3a-Fz: t (11) = 5.57, p <.0002; d = 1.61.
All correlations are highly significant (p<0.0002), indicating the null hypothesis that the correlation is equal to zero can be rejected.
The results remained highly significant (p=0.0002).
The interaction between intruder x resident genotype was also highly significant (F 2,40 = 10.71, p = 0.0002).
Apparent survival The U-CARE goodness of fit global test was highly significant (χ 2 = 36.93, d.f. = 12, p = 0.0002).
The difference between chronological and predicted ages in AD was highly significant ( p = 0.0002), whereas the difference in chronological and predicted ages in normal controls was not ( p = 0.97) ( Figure 3 ).
Post-hoc analysis of the marginally significant interaction (T x Day, Table 2 ) revealed significant effects of temperature on Day 11 (linear contrast with Bonferroni correction; Ζ = −4.045, p = 0.0002), but no difference between temperatures on Days 9 and 10.
More importantly, there was a highly significant ( p -value = 0.0002, R 2 = 0.9944) dependence of HSP60 expression on the concentration of sodium ( Fig 1C ).
Surprisingly, there was a U-shaped relationship with increased AF disease status, such that PITX2c expression was higher in subjects with no history of AF, lower in AF/SR subjects, and higher again in AF/AF subjects, with this difference highly significant (p = 2×10 −4 by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA) ( Figure 3A ).
With the exception of the consumer price index, all the nominally significant variables displayed in Text S1 (Table A) remained highly significant (P<0.0002 or lower) after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0002
It is not unexpected that race did not reach statistical significance in the stratified analysis, even though it was a strong predictor in the non-stratified model ( Table 1A , p = 0.0002).
In contrast, the difference between APU and APP on edibility ratings was highly significant (F[1,58] = 16.025, p<0.0002; power = 0.987) ( Figure 1d ).
We observed a highly significant and highly variable F IS ( F IS = 0.285, p -value > 0.0002, 95% CI = [-0.021, 0.261]) ( Fig 3 ).
Results and Discussion Metabolites and isotopic signatures With increasing CH 3 F concentration, acetate accumulated while methane accumulation was reduced accordingly ( Figure 2A ) resulting in a highly significant negative correlation (r = 0.7, P = 0.0002).
However BSO has a highly significant (p = 0.0002) effect in these cells when used in combination with 8 μM ATO.
[22] demonstrated that there was a significant trend for increased folate intake to be associated with a lower risk of lung cancer in men (P = 0.0002), and the multivariate RR for the participants with tertile 3 folate intake was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.55–0.89) when compared to those with tertile 1 folate intake.
Though this gene has been used in the literature [ 39 ], performance of this gene in our mouse panel was mediocre, and as shown in Fig 6A , the raw (non-normalized) data for B2M in our mouse muscle dataset does appear to suggest a highly significant (P = 0.0002) increase in B2M expression in dystrophic tissue.
The difference in numbers of the competitors between the two time periods at the 1900 m site was highly significant ( Χ 3 2 = 20.1, P = 0.0002).
approached significancep = 0.059
As shown in Figure 4C , the differences approached significance in the case of isoform B (t = −1.97, p = 0.059) and were highly significant in the case of isoform C (t = −4.31, p = 0.0002).