Comparative mapping A set of 367 SNPs showed highly significant matches (score>100 or E<5E-20) with genomes of model grass species rice and Brachypodium .
Excerpts
Furthermore, CD24 expression positively and significantly correlated with Src gene expression in the resected tumor tissues (p = 0.001), and Src expression showed a trend towards negative association with miR-34a expression.
Combined treatment with CsA and hATMSCs did not prevent these effects and showed a trend toward further renal deterioration.
Tajima’s D test for individual parasite populations from the GMS only detected marginally significant departures from neutrality in two populations ( Table 3 ).
The high Φ ST values obtained from comparing the South American population with populations from other continents (0.540–0.663) were highly significant even after Bonferroni corrections.
Based on unweighted kappa and/or prevalence adjusted bias adjusted kappa (PABAK), 20 of the 43 questions were deemed statistically significant at kappa and/or PABAK ≥0.5, while 12 others did not cross zero on the 95% confidence interval for kappa, indicating their probable significance.
Quantification of the mis-entry of R2–R5 axons into the medulla in wgn 22 flies revealed a highly significant increase in abnormal R2–R5 projections compared to wild-type ( Figure 1 ).
However, there was a highly significant decrease in the number of electron-dense lysosomes detected (3.33±0.38/cell profile in DMSO-treated cells vs. 0.60±0.21/cell profile in YM-201636-treated cells, n = 4 independent experiments, 6–12 cell profiles/experiment, p<0.001).
11 , this correlation is quite significant.
15 that the correlation of the C-residuals with MNCS is hardly significant.
However, the warming effects were less obvious, only fungal PLFA showed a decreasing trend under warming.
The results show an interesting trend in the exceptionality of urban TFPs, once population size has been factored out.
The contrast between group inverting physical lever (first practice block) and the other two groups (first transfer block) fell short of statistical significance, F (1,57) = 3.4, p <.10, indicating that the movement-time benefit associated with prior practice of the fine tuning was only marginally significant.
Considering ITT, accuracy of word (β = 2.57, p = 0.047) has shown to be marginally significant.
Furthermore, when performing the statistical analyses considering dominant model, we obtained borderline significance (OR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.98–1.93; p - value 0.068).
Moreover, the association between rs12512631 and CM risk was highly significant in the dominant model (OR 1.63 95% CI: 1.23–2.17; p-value 7×10 −4 ) ( Table 5 ).
The increasing degree of clustering observed with scale suggests that environmental filtering may be significant across scales but with potentially different forces at work, such as local floral resources influencing assembly processes, regional radiations, dispersal to the New World, etc.
There was a highly significant inverse association between height and AIx but there were no significant associations between height and log WRI or height and P b /P f ( table 4 ).
This outcome is most likely contributed to by the greater proportion of males in the reverter group (a difference evident as a statistical trend).
NEP-n treated mice showed a trend towards decreased congophilic staining in the contralateral hippocampus, but no significant difference as compared to NEP-m mice was observed.
Single-locus association tests only found a borderline significance of rsCACNG2_3 in the subgroup “zmd’<−2.5” (pFDRST = 0.042) after a multiple test correction ( Table S1 ).
SNP rsCACNG2_3 was the only SNP showing a marginal significance of genetic association in this study.
How might this discrepancy be explained? One possibility is that this result simply reflects noise, seeing as the direct comparison between Experiment 1 and the task switching group was only marginally significant.
Including rs4149313, there were 4 SNPs associated with MI at a nominally significant level (<0.05): rs4149313 (HR 1.36, P-value 0.004), rs2575879 (HR 1.19, P-value 0.014), rs2740487 (HR 1.16, P-value 0.034), rs10820743 (HR 0.85, P-value 0.045).
The EEG data showed significant increases in alpha and beta, and a marginally significant increase in gamma power during MFB, whereas during MGB only beta increased.