Excerpts

Secondly, the rarity of the condition resulted in a small incontinent cohort ( n = 4), limiting power for near-significant parameters (e.g., posterior anal distance, p = 0.051).

In addition, storms also had a negative and marginally significant effect in the small islet of Binicodrell Petit (t = -2.541, P = 0.051).

If we analyzed only participants who learned about a mostly competent vehicle, the Consistency × Impression Type interaction was marginally significant in the predicted direction, b = .27, SE = .14, t (350) = 1.96, p = .051.

9-HPT did not significantly correlate with any other CSF analyte, although did exhibit a positive trend with IL-20RA (p = 0.051, R 2 = 0.21).

The Hypertension × Condition interaction approached significance ( p = 0.051).

Specifically, anterior corneal flat keratometry (FK) values were 44.39 ± 1.43 D (WTR), 43.85 ± 1.42 D (ATR), and 44.18 ± 1.66 D (Oblique), approaching borderline significance ( P = 0.051).

tubiflora , results were both marginally significant with P -value = 0.051 or 0.048, respectively) for alternative coding of inflorescence types.

The effect of Condition was marginally significant in the R4 repetition lag, F (2, 26) = 3.35, p = 0.051, η p 2 = 0.205, and was not significant in the R2 repetition lag, F (2, 26) = 0.70, p = 0.505, η p 2 = 0.051.

In IPF patients, the percentages of S100A9 + CD163 − monocytes showed a trend toward a moderate correlation with the serum levels of surfactant protein-D (SP-D) ( r = 0.4158 [95% CI − 0.02042–0.7191], p = 0.051, Table 2 ).

568.8 ± 171.9; p = 0.0008), the differences in levels of plasma IL-6 between CAPS and persistent sJIA were borderline significant ( p = 0.051).

A marginally significant effect of temperature was apparent when data from the two t 5 CO 2 treatments were pooled and subject to PLS-DA (p = 0.051; Supplementary Figure S2 ).

Preliminary analyses performed in a subset of animals (Supplementary Materials) showed a marginally non-significant nonlinear correlation between PhNR amplitude and Aβ42 concentration (Spearman’s ρ = -0.59, p = 0.051).

The analysis of the modulation of intracortical facilitation at rest (ICF rest ) compared to baseline indicated a strong trend for SESSION (χ 2 (1) = 3.81, p = 0.051), pointing towards a reduction of facilitation after the follow-up session.

Multivariable analysis After adjusting for age, gender, race, stage, and histology, HLA-DRB4 was associated with improved OS ( p = 0.011, HR 0.49, 95% CI [0.29, 0.85]) and approached significance for PFS ( p = 0.051, HR 0.61, 95% CI [0.37, 1.00]).

The RSS showed a trend towards a significant increase in the weeks before exacerbation (p = 0.051).

Reduced nocturnal parasympathetic activity during RTS in the pRTS group approached significance ( p = 0.051, d = 0.765) but became significant ( p = 0.035, r = 0.612) post RTS (> 21 days after completion of RTS), suggesting sustained parasympathetic withdrawal even after medical clearance 11 , 32 .

1a ; P = 0.021), while the gene-level genetic burden was marginally significant in the same category (P = 0.051).

Only figural elaboration showed a marginally significant effect ( p = 0.051).

There was an almost significant interaction between proximity and order ( F (1, 18) = 4.38, p = 0.051, ηp 2 = 0.196).

There were significant main effects of image category, F (1, 36) = 9.62, p < 0.004, and a marginally significant effect of hemifield, F (1, 36) = 4.08, p = 0.051.

Both the categories of “most advanced degree in education” and “total household income” exhibited a borderline significant association with HL ( p = 0.051 and p = 0.052, respectively).

There were marginally significant interactions among benzodiazepines, stimulus, and task during the early P3 phase (450–550 ms) for the central area ( F 2, 49 = 3.156, P = 0.051, η 2 = 0.114) and significant interactions for occipital area ( F 2, 49 = 3.347, P = 0.043, η 2 = 0.120).

The main effect of visual field showed a nonsignificant trend ( F (1,12) = 4.7, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.28), indicating a left visual field advantage.

However, the difference in CFT between groups 1 and 3 was nearly significant ( p = 0.051).

Mean HbA1c was higher in women than in men and this increased with increasing age in men ( Supplementary Table 1 ) and the increase was almost significant in the data for men and women combined ( Table 2 , P = 0.051).