Excerpts

Although parity was not significant in the general model, an important trend was evidenced in parity 3 (coef. = 3.33; p = 0.059), which could reflect a critical stage in the maturation of maternal behavior, consistent with the observations of 29 .

Univariate GLM analysis showed that the difference between depression ratings under MDMA and placebo of both female genotype groups was statistically significant ( F 1,39 = 4.76, p = 0.04, ƞ p 2 = 0.19); for males this difference approached significance ( F 1,39 = 3.78, p = 0.059, ƞ p 2 = 0.09).

5 B middle), although anger was marginally significant in the same condition (r = 0.42, P = 0.059; Fig. 5 B right).

This correlation approached significance ( r = 0.36, p = 0.059, one-tailed).

The analyses of the accuracy data revealed an almost significant linear contrast of the auditory-cue*target-saliency interaction (F(1.28) = 3.88, p = 0.059, η p 2 = 0.12).

Post-hoc tests on AUC error (Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons) following a significant Task*Stimulation Group interaction; F(2, 86) = 15.33, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.26, revealed this trend was significant between the cerebellar and M1 group ( p = 0.019) while a strong trend was found for the cerebellar and sham group difference ( p = 0.059).

Following this up with two separate analysis for each assessment day, we found the main effect of stimulation on the second (but not the first) day of assessment at the level of near-significant tendency (F (2; 69) = 2.944; p = 0.059; ηp 2 = 0.079), with higher accuracy for abstract words in anodal tDCS than in sham group, albeit only at tendency level (p = 0.091; Z = − 2.2) (Fig. 5 ).

The model term for the interaction of Group and Task Type approached significance for Optode 9 (F = 3.62, p = 0.059).

Significant individual predictors: Involuntary memory While Model 3 (see Table 4 ) was statistically significant, none of the individual predictors reached conventional levels of significance, although MAIA Noticing showed a positive trend (B = 0.266, SE = 0.138, t = 1.92, p = .059, β = 0.245), suggesting individuals more attuned to bodily sensations may experience more involuntary memories.

The SPPB significantly increased in the CRT group (∆ = 2.09, 95%CI (1.39, 2.79), p = 0.004) showed a trend towards a significant increase in the LRT-BFR group (∆ = 0.60, 95%CI (− 0.09, 1.29), p = 0.059) (Fig. 2 ).

Network Size had a marginally significant effect on gradiency (β = 0.23, b = 0.026, SE = 0.013, t(60) = 1.92, p = .059) in the same direction.

However, the mixed model in the non-flash suppression condition (Table S2 ) revealed a trend toward significance for the interaction between group and condition ( p = 0.059).

However, such a difference was very close to significance also in the ET [ t (22) = −2.65, p = 0.059, d = −0.53], and the Bayes factor value (BF 10 = 3.6) provided moderate support to the alternative hypothesis.

Due to large variations in the cross-section area within the group of neuromas and non-affected nerves, FR and CSA showed a trend for a correlation (r = 0.453) without being significant (p = 0.059, see Fig. 7 B) while VR and CSA correlated significantly (r = 0.513, p = 0.03; see Fig. 7 C).

We found a small, marginally non-significant positive period × time interaction ( β = 0.002, 95% CI [−0.000, 0.004], t (49) = 1.946, p =.059), a non-significant effect of time ( β = −0.001, 95% CI [−0.003, 0.000], t (49) = −1.605, p =.117), and a significant negative effect of period ( β = −0.073, 95% CI [−0.135, −0.012], t (49) = −2.402, p =.021) (Supplementary Table S6, Figure S4).

The factor of gender did not reach significance (Wald χ 2 (1) = 2.477, p = 0.116), but the interaction of culture and gender became borderline significant (Wald χ 2 (3) = 7.456, p = .059).

However, we observed a trend for the interaction between wounds evolution and time but at the limit of significance (p = 0.059).

1 , the RTs of deceptive responses (385.17 ± 84.47 ms) were longer than the RTs of truthful responses (375.54 ± 88.09 ms), and the difference was marginally significant (t(26) = 1.976, p = 0.059).

As the same term was close to significance for state 1 with opposite sign ( t 6 = − 2.32, p = 0.059, Cohen’s d = − 0.55 ± 0.87), we probed the difference between state 1 and 3 counts (Counts 3 − Counts 1 ) in a follow-up analysis: the interaction remained significant ( t 6 = 4.6, p = 0.004, Cohen’s d = 1.08 ± 0.92), indicating that the more state 3 is expressed over state 1, the better the recovery, in a way that also depends on the MR signature.

In contrast, DFAα1 after 1 year in the patients was significantly lower than that in the controls, and the difference in DFAα1 between the acute stage and 1 year was borderline significant (p = 0.059, data not shown).

11 C-deuterium-L-deprenyl PET region of interest analysis Comparisons of four groups (presymptomatic ADAD carriers, MCI PIB+, sAD and ADAD non-carriers) using Kruskal-Wallis tests in each of 11 ROIs (except for the cerebellum), showed a trend toward statistical significance for the anterior cingulate cortex, the thalamus and the hippocampus (p = 0.059–0.069) ( Supplementary Table S1b ).

There were no significant differences between groups for age, gender (although this approached significance, p = 0.059), Latino/Hispanic ethnicity, employment status, or musical training (all p values > 0.05).

Self-reported overall general well-being almost reached statistical significance ( Z = 1.890, p = 0.059).

This decrease was only statistically significant in exon 4 (χ 2 = 12, P = 0.001) and marginally significant in intron 2a (χ 2 = 3.556, P = 0.059), whereas it was non-significant in exon 2 (χ 2 = 1.815, P = 0.178).

Platelet aggregation Compared with the IR group, the clopidogrel + IR group had lower MaxAR-ADP (9.65 ± 5.60% vs 75.52 ± 14.99%, P < 0.05) and AveAR-ADP values (13.22 ± 5.81% vs 71.32 ± 16.66%, P < 0.05) and showed an increasing trend for MaxAT-ADP (447.67 ± 49.45 s vs 374.83 ± 67.81 s, P = 0.059); the TMAO + clopidogrel + IR group had lower MaxAR-ADP (35.05 + 24.93%, P < 0.05) and AveAR-ADP values (25.50 + 18.60%, P < 0.05).