Bernoulli GLMM analysis of the effect of forest fragment size on tree hyrax singing indicated that “forest size” was a highly significant covariate in tree hyrax singing probability (P-value < 0.0001) (Table 1 e, Fig.
Excerpts
bacteria resulted in highly significant increases in bacterial growth ( P < 0.0001), compared to controls.
The results of the pairwise t-tests for TomatoRipen-MMT and the best baseline (two-stream CNN) indicated a highly significant improvement (t = 6.18, p < 0.0001) with very large effect size (d = 2.14).
Contemporaneous and between person models The within-person contemporaneous network was also dense with most associations highly significant (p < 0.0001).
There was a highly significant difference between the infection rates of woodpigeons with S. calchasi across federal states (p < 0.0001).
Beta diversity analysis reveals a highly significant difference in community membership between the breast and skin tissue microbiota, as indicated by unweighted UniFrac analysis (MiRKAT P < 1e-4, Fig. 2E ), but the difference is not significant in weighted analysis (MiRKAT P = 0.14, Fig. 2F ), indicating that the major difference lies in the rare or less abundant lineages 22 .
The differences in Q ′ values between the control and CVD cohorts are highly significant, with two-tailed p -values < 1 × 10 −4 (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table S3 ).
In the second stage, SNPs/loci that passed a significant threshold (p < 0.05) were further pruned down with bonferroni correction and only those SNPs that were highly significant (p < 0.00013, Supplementary Table 3 ), and belonged in particular, to the extracellular matrix (ECM) i.e., Aggrecan and Fibulin-1 genes were selected for genotyping, as these genes were up-regulated and associated with aPWV in the gene profiling work.
approached significancep-value = 1.48 × 10 −4
The SZ_128 and SZ_342 features had no association, but the SZ_1M was higher in this subgroup compared to the other cases (Cohen’s d = 2.66) and could have approached significance (p-value = 1.48 × 10 −4 ) if not for the Bonferroni correction.
The difference between the decay profile of non-cuticular and cuticle characters is highly significant (Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon p = 0.00018).
The dose and response exhibit a significant trend (at the 0.05 level) for both datasets (one-tailed Cochran-Armitage test 31 , n = 6 and P value = 1.91 × 10 −4 for DS1, n = 11 and P value = 1.11 × 10 −5 for DS2).
The correlation between the clock time estimate and clock time setting deviations was highly significant ( r =−0.88, p < 0.0002).
This is also confirmed by the results of the ANOSIM test, wherein there was a strong and highly significant difference in assemblage composition among habitat alteration types (ANOSIM R = 0.759, P = 0.0002).
By 17 weeks, the RNFL showed progressive thinning, with a highly significant difference between CON and gOHT groups (p = 0.0002).
This caused a highly significant (p = 0.0002) decrease in OPC viability (Fig. 1h ).
Similarly, the relationship between support for recycling and the belief in the economic benefit of recycling shows an intercept of 3.782 and a highly significant coefficient of 0.2084 ( P = 0.0002), with a confidence interval from 0.098 to 0.318.
3C–F ; the decrease was highly significant in the lung ( P = 0.0002) and almost achieved significance (p = 0.069) in the heart).
Moreover, multiple comparison analysis showed highly significant levels of β-III tubulin ( P = 0.0002), Nf-L ( P = 0.0403) and GFAP ( P < 0.015) in the subgroup of CSZ clozapine-treated.
For females, this resulted in highly significant subspecies divergence in contact (t 55 = −4.19, P = 0.0002) but not allopatric samples (t 18 = −0.14, P = 0.89).
We observed 192.7 nmol/100 mg tissue as the lowest value in the two experimental groups compared to a mean of 99.6 ± 42.3 nmol/100 mg tissue in the control group, resulting in a highly significant difference between control and experimental groups (p = 0.0002), see Fig. 1 A.
The PRC diagram (highly significant, pseudoF = 52.3, p = 0.0002, Fig. 5 ) clearly demonstrated the responses to experimental manipulations.
Moreover, linear regression analysis indeed indicated a highly significant (p = 0.0002) positive correlation between O -GlcNAc level and Akt phosphorylation in cervical tissues (Fig. 5 b).
Although only 16 among the 702 participants had experienced a stroke, a highly significant association to the Lewis(a−b−) blood group was observed for this group (P = 0.0002, OR: 22.28; CI 95: 4.72–131.63 - Table 2 ).
In general, the difference in CYP2W1 expression between normal tissue and primary tumours was highly significant (P ≤ 0.0002).
coli O157:H7 was extremely significant compared to the control ( p = 0.0002), but ratios of Fura-2 with non-target bacteria weren’t found the significant differences compared to the control ( p > 0.05) in the ground beef extract samples.