Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
After adjusting for baseline GAD-7 scores, marital status, and residence using ANCOVA, the group difference remained highly significant, F (1, 146) = 42.8, p < .001, partial η 2 = 0.226, with adjusted mean difference of 4.4 points (95% CI 3.2, 5.6) and adjusted means of 6.4 ( SE = 0.4) for the VR group versus 10.8 ( SE = 0.4) for the control group.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The competence dimension, reflecting the students’ belief in their capabilities to perform effectively, was markedly higher among the trained group (18.77 ± 2.09) compared to the control group (15.82 ± 4.38), with a highly significant difference (t = 3.81, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was no main effect of prey size on pre-capture all-occurrence behaviors, but the comparison for behaviors surrounding consumption (post-capture all-occurrence behaviors and timed variables) was highly significant (MANOVA: Hotelling’s Trace = 2.3, F 24,82 = 3.9, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the presence of known predictors of 30-day mortality, mean sentiment polarity was a highly significant predictor in a multiple logistic regression model (Adjusted OR = 0.4626, p < 0.001, 95% CI: [0.4244, 0.5041]) and led to improved predictive accuracy (AUROC = 0.8189 versus 0.8092, 95% BCI of difference: [0.0070, 0.0126]).
Patients with an SDI ≥4 showed significantly higher ICA-RI (0.70 (0.68–0.77, IQR) vs 0.67 (0.60–0.72, IQR); p=0.032), while differences in ICA-PI (1.34 (1.22–1.69, IQR) vs 1.19 (1.01–1.51, IQR); p=0.057) approached, but did not reach statistical significance. cIMT correlated with age (r=0.47, p<0.001), MAP (r=0.302, p<0.001) and long-term medication with statin (r=0.26, p<0.001) and showed an inverse association with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r=−0.202, p=0.011). cIMT was furthermore lower in patients with ENA-positivity than in those without detectable ENA (0.78 mm (0.69–0.9, IQR) vs 0.84 mm (0.74–0.95, IQR); p=0.012).
a strong trendP<0.0010.0× alphagold
Using our validated histological scoring system, we were able to detect significantly more villous distortion and total inflammation in TNF i∆ARE/i∆ARE → SCID mice compared to wt → SCID mice, and a strong trend towards more chronic inflammation as well (villous distortion index: 4.00 ± 0.00 vs. 2.00 ± 0.00, P<0.001; chronic inflammatory index: 4.5 ± 1.05 vs. 0.75 ± 0.75, P=0.06; total inflammatory score: 9.25 ± 1.19 vs. 3.25 ± 1.25, P<0.05).