Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

a negative trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
For baseline lipid testing, there was a small positive step change during the quarter the consensus statement was published (1.5%, P = 02); however, the positive growth in baseline lipid testing was also attenuated after the statement as evidenced by a negative trend change after the statement (−0.5% per quarter, P < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
ERD demonstrated pervasive and highly significant positive associations with pain across multiple regions, with the largest effects observed in the neck (β = 0.0071, 95% CI: 0.0055–0.0087, p < 0.001), arm (β = 0.0069, 95% CI: 0.0054–0.0084, p < 0.001), back (β = 0.0063, 95% CI: 0.0049–0.0078, p < 0.001), and chest (β = 0.0057, 95% CI: 0.0038–0.0076, p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Compared to the corresponding normal tissue, a highly significant expression ( p < 0.001) was found in eighteen tumor tissues, including bladder urothelial carcinomas (BLCA), invasive breast carcinoma (BC), cholangiocarcinomas (CHOL), colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), esophageal carcinomas (ESCA), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the hea
highly significantp<0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The dependence of the abundance of these proteins upon NOX1 protein levels was found highly significant for both up-regulated and down-regulated proteins (t 47 = -4.97, p<0.001 and t 311 = 7.27, p<0.001 respectively) ( Fig. 3 ).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis The data were analyzed with SPSS for Windows (version 18, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and expressed as the means±standard deviations (SD).The significant thresholds were: P < 0.05 was considered significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant, while P < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant.