Two-way ANOVA showed that both of carbon source and oxygen level exhibited highly significant effects on μ max and glutamate production, as did their interaction ( p < 0.001***) .
Excerpts
For baseline lipid testing, there was a small positive step change during the quarter the consensus statement was published (1.5%, P = 02); however, the positive growth in baseline lipid testing was also attenuated after the statement as evidenced by a negative trend change after the statement (−0.5% per quarter, P < 0.001).
ERD demonstrated pervasive and highly significant positive associations with pain across multiple regions, with the largest effects observed in the neck (β = 0.0071, 95% CI: 0.0055–0.0087, p < 0.001), arm (β = 0.0069, 95% CI: 0.0054–0.0084, p < 0.001), back (β = 0.0063, 95% CI: 0.0049–0.0078, p < 0.001), and chest (β = 0.0057, 95% CI: 0.0038–0.0076, p < 0.001).
LPS stimulation as well as incubation with lambda-carrageenan resulted in highly significant induction of TNF-α transcription compared to unstimulated control (p < 0.001 for LPS stimulation and lambda-carrageenan).
Compared to the corresponding normal tissue, a highly significant expression ( p < 0.001) was found in eighteen tumor tissues, including bladder urothelial carcinomas (BLCA), invasive breast carcinoma (BC), cholangiocarcinomas (CHOL), colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), esophageal carcinomas (ESCA), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the hea
Not surprisingly, there was a highly significant correlation between length and weight of ( R 2 = 0.97%; P < 0.001).
Moreover, in the young and old age groups ( N = 19 and N = 237, respectively), a highly significant difference in CRP levels was observed (Z = −3.970, p < 0.001).
The difference between the two mode of applications was highly significant ( P < .001).
The dependence of the abundance of these proteins upon NOX1 protein levels was found highly significant for both up-regulated and down-regulated proteins (t 47 = -4.97, p<0.001 and t 311 = 7.27, p<0.001 respectively) ( Fig. 3 ).
The results also agreed with previous findings [58] , [59] that the incubation temperature has highly significant effects on the viral polymerase activity (F = 271; P<0.001).
p < 0.05 was considered significant (*), p < 0.01 was considered highly significant (**), and p < 0.001 was considered highly significant (***).
The duration of diabetes exhibits a notable negative correlation with limits of stability, which is highly significant (B = −0.09, SE = 0.02; Beta = −0.31; t = −4.50, p = 0.001).
All the fixed effects analyzed—month (year), flock size, flock size × THI, THI (year) and THI (month)—were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all milk composition traits, with the exception of log 10 SCC ( Table 3 ).
At 4 and 8 μg/mL, MDA were increased and highly significant ( P < 0.001) followed by 12, 16, and 20 μg/mL.
The ANCOVA model was highly significant (R2 = 0.86, F(4,86) = 135.3, p < 0.001).
visuo-haptic stimulation, F(1,7) = 1.88, p = 0.21), and the interaction between the two factors was highly significant (F(1,7) = 139.74, p < 0.001).
Bartlett’s test was highly significant (p<0.001) for the dataset, as well as for both subsets.
Interestingly, the percentage of early apoptotic cells in HSA:HSA condition remained low whereas the AbIX:AlbIX condition showed a higher percentage that was clearly significant at the 72 h time point (p < 0.001).
The annual prevalence of CH presented a decreasing trend (from 7.52 to 5.98 per 10,000 births, P < 0.001).
There was a significant trend in recall according to time since stopping use of HRT (χ 2 1 (trend) = 14.0, p < 0.001), suggesting the wearing off of the effect of HRT over time in past users [ 3 ].
Comparing the Kaplan-Meier survival curves, only rCBV and rCTH in the enhancing tumor and rCTH in a combined region consisting of enhancing tumor and edema are associated with TTP and OS, where predicting OS by means of rCTH is highly significant (p < 0.001).
Three of the control variables (female age distribution, fertility change, and ratio of proportions dead) were highly significant (p<0.001), and the fourth (lagged HIV prevalence) was significant at 5%.
Statistical analysis The data were analyzed with SPSS for Windows (version 18, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and expressed as the means±standard deviations (SD).The significant thresholds were: P < 0.05 was considered significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, P < 0.001 was considered very highly significant, while P < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant.
showed a trendp < 0.001
In our cohort, higher baseline CRP was significantly associated with higher baseline EED in the unifactorial analysis but only showed a trend when adjusting for confounders ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.055, respectively).
In the category with the greatest increase in commuting level, highly significant excesses (P <0.001) of leukaemia are present at ages 0-4 and 0-14 (observed to expected ratios 1.76 based on 46 cases, and 1.50, based on 79 cases).