Excerpts

Trial Registration The MEPP study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, www.drks.de; ID: DRKS00016412) eating disorder inpatient latent change score model personality functioning psychotherapy The level of PF and the severity of ED pathology at admission showed a highly significant, moderate positive correlation ( r = 0.43, p < 0.001).

Age and the Charlson co-morbidity index are independent and highly significant ( p < 0.001) predictors for mortality [ 7 ].

Statistical analysis of the fractal dimensions revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ) between low and high myopia, as well as between low and moderate myopia, based on independent sample t -tests.

When we took into account study designs, the meta-analysis yielded no association between NSW and BC in cohort studies (pooled effect estimate = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.91–1.18, I 2 = 36.3%, p = 0.139); for nested case–control studies, it showed an almost significant risk increase, although with high heterogeneity (pooled effect estimate = 1.34, 95%CI = 0.96–1.88, I 2 = 82.2%, p < 0.001); and, finally, in case–control studies, the pooled risk indicated an excess risk of BC among exposed women (pooled effect estimate = 1.22, 95%CI = 1.01–1.48, I 2 = 0.0%, p = 0.613).

The CSI total scores were also higher in those with constipation, with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

Both performances in EO and EC showed that the differences between sexes were not significant in the younger subjects ( Figure 2 ) but became highly significant in the older individuals (EO_ SI : w = 52.7 versus m = 60.8, P < 0.001; EC_ SI : w = 29.0 versus m = 35.7, P < 0.001).

Autochthonous Malaria trends in Spain throughout the 20th Century After applying the Mann-Kendall-Test for the trends of the annual number of cases for the malaria mortality in Spain (1900–1959) we have found a significant trend ( n = 59, p < 0.001, slope ( Q ) = −50.8).

The regression coefficients were highly significant for samples A1, A3 and A5 ( P < 0.001), with R2 values of 0.982, 0.959, and 0.905, respectively.

Programs analyzed showed a significant trend toward reduced depressive symptoms (SMD –0.58, 95% CI –0.71 to –0.45, P <.001).

The mean MCV of those with IDA was 61.05 ± 7.58, with ACD was 77.59 ± 10.6, and those with macrocytic anemia was 112.73 ± 9.78, the intertype differences being highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Those with the risk alleles of the other two polymorphisms showed a trend (at p <0.001, uncorrected) towards lower regional brain volumes.

The analysis undertaken with all the GS scored data including or excluding the STh accession provided strong evidence of a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between at least one pair of GS sesame accessions under study ( Table 3 ).

2 is a highly significant model ( P = 0.001).

In contrast, differences in preoperative weight were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This prospective study demonstrated a highly significant reduction in the annual rates of painful crises in the patients treated with hydroxyurea compared to the placebo group (2.5 vs. 4.5 painful crises/year, P < 0.001) and thus was terminated early [ 17 ].

Doctors’ attitude showed a trend similar to the overall completeness, while nurses improved more consistently (p<0.001).

For total active behaviors summed across the 12 time points, the effect of treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Figure 3 b).

Table 4 depicts the detailed comparison analysis of plasma citrulline levels with the presence and absence of HLA genotype Agreement between plasma citrulline and DBS filter paper citrulline assay Correlation between plasma and DBS filter paper citrulline levels was evaluated in 405 cases and the obtained correlation was statistically highly significant (Interclass Correlation Coefficient = .50, P < .001).

The demographic data, regarding HCV, showed a highly significant difference in HCC and cirrhotic groups vs control (P = 0.001), and also between HCC vs cirrhotic group (P = 0.01).

When comparing the Parkinson’s disease patients of the PPP dataset with the ABRIM dataset comprising more healthy control subjects, NAcc, SNc, SNr, and RN showed highly significant differences (adjusted p -value < 0.001) on both R 2 * and χ (dark yellow, Fig. 7b, c ).

Regarding vine row, only 5 variables selected by the RF model were significantly different between treatments, and TN was the only soil variable with a highly significant difference (F = 10.82, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 C).

A distinct pattern of change was observed, with (highly significant: p < .001) improvements for the Pyramid group (on the three subscales), with large effect sizes for emotional symptoms ( d = 0.79) and peer relationship problems ( d = 0.82); comparison pupils showed minimal change.

A highly significant difference in sedation scores was observed between the groups at 30 min, 1 h, and 4 h ( P < 0.001).

Kaplan Meier analysis considering tumor size exceeding 800 mm 3 as an endpoint showed a highly significant difference between curves ( p = 0.001) ( Figure 6 A,B).

The relationship between urban soil OC density (beneath both impervious surfaces and greenspace) and depth was described by a highly significant negative exponential function ( R 2 = 57%, F (1, 184) = 243.8, p <0.001, y = 51.910(±2.492 S.E.)e −0.0232 (± 0.002 S.E.)× ) ( Fig. 1 ).