Excerpts

The increase in LDL aggregation in the SAT group was also highly significant in ANCOVA ( P =0.002) with baseline aggregation as the covariate.

A significant trend where individuals with higher BMI were more likely to have low testosterone was identified ( p = 0.002) (Table 2 ), and this association was evident when assessing both primary ( p = 0.032) and secondary ( p = 0.028) low total serum testosterone (Table 3 ).

The Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) score was identified as a highly significant factor ( P = .002, HR 1.547, 95% CI 1.177–2.032), whereas the presence of cirrhosis, body mass index, and sex had no significant effect.

These effects are highly significant in a contrast slope test (populism: p = .002; EU-skepticism: p = .001).

The mean duration of motor block was more in Group III (156.66 ± 5.62), followed by Group II (139.16 ± 4.16) and Group I (124.50 ± 8.34), which was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.002).

Anemia Among women, the trend over the 4 iron perception categories (none, a little, a medium amount, a lot) to anemia was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

A significant trend was seen for reason for use with younger athletes using cannabis more for recreational ( p = 0.002) and both THC and CBD for medical and recreational reasons (p = 0.009), while older athletes used cannabis for medical purposes (p < 0.001).

Among all age groups, the highest monoresistance was for INH (1.2%), and across age groups, only INH monoresistance showed a decreasing trend with age ( P = .002).

HADS-A score and anxiety rate at different time points HADS-A score was 6.9 ± 3.1, 7.3 ± 3.1, 7.7 ± 3.3, and 8.0 ± 3.5 at M0, M12, M24, and M36, respectively, which exhibited an increasing trend ( P = .002) (Table S1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/MD/G520 ) (Fig. 1 A).

Not only that, the comprehensive effects revealed that the Pregnancies-Third trimester deliveries to a highly significant difference in both groups [OR = 3.90; 95% CI (1.66, 9.18); P = 0.002].

Although this did not reach statistical significance, a mild negative correlation was observed in patients aged ≥75 years (r s = −0.13, P = 0.002).

However, the quadratic model for TPC exhibited a highly significant lack‐of‐fit ( p = 0.002), indicating that the model did not adequately fit the experimental data (see Table S4 ).

The relationships between six of the seven ecosystem functions and the aboveground plant biomass (as a proxy for megaherbivore grazing intensity) were highly significant ( p < .002, Figure 2 ).

As shown in Fig 2(B) , there was a highly significant correlation between reaction time and the mean voltage N270(r = -0.325. p = 0.002).

However, between McGrath MAC and Macintosh and Truview and Macintosh groups, the difference was highly significant ( P = 0.002 for each).

Here, the spatial information is 0.89 bits per spike and highly significant ( p = 0.002), because that value is far above the 95th percentile of the shuffled distribution ( Fig. 5 A , right).

Friends and neighbors were significantly more common mechanism of coping in women if they had more children, and a significant trend was detected in our study (Chi-square for trend P value = 0.002).

The power law (Equation (2)) fitted to the descending segment of l was highly significant ( F 1,36 = 10.84, P = 0.002, R 2 = 0.583, lack of fit with F 7,29 = 1.14, P = 0.366).

Adults that were reared at 26 °C had a higher starvation tolerance than those reared at 26–37 °C, with differences being highly significant for both females (Log-rank test: χ 2 = 9.493, df = 1, p = 0.002) and males (χ 2 = 18.243, df = 1, p < 0.001).

These three independent variables (solid-liquid ratio, extraction times, number of extractions) had a highly significant impact on the extraction rate (F-value = 24.93, F-value = 15.28, F-value = 254.46; p = 0.002, p = 0.006, p = 0.001).

Highly significant positive correlations were observed for the AMD group when association of the variables Cu and LF ( r = 0.839, P = 0.002), Na and Ca ( r = 0.710, P = 0.006), and Mg and Ca ( r = 0.835, P = 0.0003) were evaluated ( Figs. 4 D–F).

A highly significant difference (p = 0.002) was present in the mean fear score concerning the number of family members with a higher score among those who had fewer than four family members (25.90 ± 5.91).

However, at −1 SD, it was approaching significance (Non-Reactivity = −4.4105), with an effect of B = 0.16, SE = 0.05, p < 0.002.

Likelihood ratio test comparison between the full and null models was highly significant ( χ 9 2 = 19.46 , p = 0.002).

Among the Maya, the association between the PSS score and hot flashes approached significance ( p = 0.002).