Excerpts

For brodifacoum and bromadiolone, these differences were highly significant (i.e. p ≤ 0.002; Table 1 ).

However, the differences were highly significant between the CG (control group) and the studied groups (BCT+ALND, BCT+SLNB) for the following parameters: BETA angle of thoracolumbar spine inclination ( p = 0.002), GAMMA angle of thoracic spine inclination ( p = 0.0044), TKA (thoracic kyphosis angle) ( p < 0.0001) and shoulder level inclination ( p = 0.0004).

A correlation test was thus performed between Kmax and the eye movement parameter, revealing a highly significant association between Kmax and the number of eye movements (Kendall’s Tau–B, 0.440, p = 0.002) (Fig. 1 ).

Figure 1 (a) shows that there were no changes in overall adherence over time ( P = 0.108) and adherence in ED-PrEP users ( P = 0.270), whereas D-PrEP users showed a decreasing trend (from 78% in the first follow-up to 73.1% after 12 months, P = 0.002).

In relation to other dental occlusion values, the cases presented a significant trend towards an edge-to-edge and/or inverted overjet (41 cases, 68.3%, vs. 288 controls, 49.6%; p = 0.002), as well as posterior crossbite occlusion (14 cases, 23.3%, versus 18 controls, 3.1% p < 0.001); no such trend appeared for overbite ( p = 0.081) (Table 3 ).

The difference between the groups in the correlation indices vis à vis the end of training was marginally significant at 24 h ( t (26) = −2.00, P = 0.056); however, at 1-wk retest the difference was highly significant ( t (26) = −3.37, P = 0.002).

However, when associated with host order, which itself had highly significant influence ( p = 0.002; R 2 = 0.2072), it strengthened the host order effect ( Figure 3 A).

The mean duration of motor block was more in Group III (156.66 ± 5.62), followed by Group II (139.16 ± 4.16) and Group I (124.50 ± 8.34), which was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.002).

The Blinking Rate The rate of blinking per minute was recorded to vary from 18 to 40 blinks/min with a mean value of 25.32/min (±6.15 SD) in Group A patients as compared to a range from 15 to 24 blinks/min with a mean of 20.44/min (±2.25 SD) in group B; the difference between the two groups was found to be statistically highly significant ( P = 0.002).

The findings were highly significant at P = 0.002 for position and P = 0.006 for attachment.

cochlear implant hearing aid electroencephalography auditory evoked potentials source localization speech recognition bimodal benefit auditory rehabilitation Post-implantation, paired t tests ( t values) and Wilcoxon tests in case of non-normality ( z values) showed significant improvements of speech recognition with the CI ear between T3 and T4 for the OlSa S0 ( z = 3.296, ∗∗ p < 0.001), S0N0 ( t = 3.300, ∗∗ p < 0.001), and S0NHA ( z = 2.638, ∗ p < 0.009) conditions when applying the Bonferroni-corrected significance limen for significant ∗ ( p < 0.01) and highly significant ∗∗ ( p < 0.002) differences ( Figure 1 ).

SM exhibited a highly significant negative correlation between mtCN and the total number of heteroplasmies for all three methods (r = -0.27 to -0.31, all p≤0.002; Fig 4 and S4 Table ).

After stratification by region, the authors reported a marginally significant association between increased time-weighted arsenic exposure and elevated risk of breast cancer in Aarhus (Incidence Rate Ratio [IRR] = 1.06, 95%CI 1.01–1.11, p = 0.002) [ 45 ].

Moreover, the average motor pointing direction in perceptual probe trials (compare Figure 6B ) correlated negatively with the average perceived pointing direction (compare Figure 3C ) in the perceptual probe trials preceded by the same manipulation: analysed on the population level, this correlation exhibited a strong effect size and was highly significant (r(7) = −0.88, P = .002).

The model was highly significant (p = 0.002) and explained 37% of the AIDS incidence variation among the municipalities (R = 0.61).

The amount of reduction in probing depth within the three groups was statistically highly significant (p=0.002**for group A; p<0.001**for group B and p<0.001** for group C).

Hospitalization The cumulative hospitalization rates were 40.3 per 100 patient-years in the HD group and 33.5 per 100 patient-years in the matched PD group, and this was a nominally significant result (P = 0.002) (Table 3 ).

By day 60, ASV richness exhibited a decreasing trend with immigration in both homogenous treatments, reaching significance only in Long‐Long ( p = 0.002) but not in Fen‐Fen ( p = 0.151).

17 The main finding was the highly significant reduction of new MI occurrence in the complete group (7.9% vs 5.4%, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.87, P = .002).

A decreasing trend across quarters was also observed for behind-the-neck treatments on pets (p = 0.002).

However, it was highly significant compared with that caused by LIRA alone (−0.19 ± 0.11 mg/kg/min) ( P = 0.002).

However, the role of anxiodepressive syndromes was highly significant ( p = 0.002) with borderline significance for joint pain ( p = 0.05).

We fit individual taxa using the function envfit , also in the vegan package, and subsequently filtered the taxa based on which had a highly significant correlation with the NMDS axes ( P ≤ 0.002; SI Appendix , Fig.

However, the correlations between IL-6 and headache (r = 0.572, p = 0.017) and between IL-6 and concentration problems (r = 0.536, p = 0.027) showed a trend towards significance (taking into account multiple comparisons, a conservative p -value cut-off was applied for statistical significance, which was set at p < 0.002).

The interaction effects between IL-10 response and sewage system were highly significant ( p -values = 0.002, 0.002 and 0.001, respectively, for IFN-γ, IL-5 and IL-13).