Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

an increasing trendP = 0.0020.0× alphagold
The average BMI reimbursement per hospitalization showed an increasing trend before the reform, with an upward slope of 1.7% per month ( β 1 = 0.017, P = 0.002), and fell by 41.2% in the month of the reform ( β 2 = −0.412, P < 0.001), and the monthly trend decreased by 2% ( β 3 = −0.020, P = 0.037).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
2a ), leading to highly significant two pairs of negative correlations between SALL4 and miR-200c ( P = 0.002, R = -0.3157, Pearson’s correlation coefficients) or miR-200c and PD-L1 ( P = 0.0007, R = -0.3469, Pearson’s correlation coefficients), accompanied with a positive correlation between SALL4 and PD-L1 expression ( P < 0.0001, R = 0.3773, Pearson’s correlation coefficients) (Fig. 2b ); however, no statistical correlation among these molecules was identified in peritumor regions ( P = 0.2441, R = 0.0771; P = 0.2927, R = 0.0604; P = 0.3921, R = 0.0292, Pearson’s correlation coefficients) (Fig. 2c, d ).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Furthermore, the plasma triglycerides-to-HDL ratio, a known marker for metabolic syndrome and highly atherogenic dyslipidemia,[ 18 ] showed a highly significant correlation with mFD (r = 0.480, p = 0.002).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While moths responded the fastest under cool phosphor-coated LEDs (on average 12 s faster than under other treatments, figure 2 b ), the interaction between light CCT and emission spectrum was only a near-significant predictor of latency ( F 1,326 = 3.68, p = 0.06), but, in isolation, both were highly significant predictors (CCT: F 2,326 = 6.65, p = 0.002; spectrum: F 1,327 = 9.13, p = 0.003).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results of that analysis, shown in Figure 3 , confirm that degree of perturbation was more difficult to distinguish for some PL animations compared to others, but the pattern of results was the same for healthy controls and patients, with the correlation between groups being highly significant (r = 0.85, p = 0.002).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant correlation between pathway abundance and species distance matrices ( r = 0.299, P = 0.002; Table 1 ) from the metagenomic data. 16S rRNA genera versus metagenomic species and 16S rRNA versus metabolites had the second and third highest correlation values ( r = 0.117, P = 0.067; r = 0.103, P = 0.039), respectively.
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In our previous studies (1) 12 twin pairs analyzed (gut microbial profiling) using PLS-DA showed highly significant correlations between pairs ( 53 ) and (2) examination of 136 samples from 32 patients ( n = 20 NEC or LOS) showed significant differences ( p = 0.002) in microbiomic patterns between diseased and healthy individuals ( 24 ).
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the 53 observations where the IgG Index is ≤ 1.14, there is a highly significant positive correlation between number of OCBs and the IgG Index ( r = 0.39, slope = 11.45, se = 3.74, p = 0.002); however, in the 16 observations where the IgG Index is greater than 1.14 but less than 1.9, the slope decreases, but not significantly so ( r = -0.14, slope = -6.09, se = 11.68, p = 0.68) ( Fig 2C ).