Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A forest plot ( Figure 3 a) from three studies (MED range; 1.0–2.5) of oral intake studies with healthy participants ( n = 175) revealed a highly significant pooling difference ( p = 0.002) in pre-and post-intervention changes in erythema index (SMD: −0.35; 95% CI, −0.57 to −0.13; I 2 = 4%, p = 0.40) in the random-effects model.
a trend toward significancep = 0.0020.0× alpha
Furthermore, with a trend toward significance, the distribution of mGluR 5 receptors overlaps with the rs‐FC modification of Crus I ( R = 0.775, uncorrected p = 0.002, SA‐corrected p = 0.02) and Vermis IV‐V ( R = 0.420, uncorrected p = 0.003, SA‐corrected p = 0.051).
At 3 months, PPD changes were −1.46 mm for the test quadrants and −1.25 mm coming very close to statistical significance (p = 0.002) with a further improvement to −1.74 mm in test quadrants and −1.55 mm in the control quadrants at 12 months with p values still not significant.
highly significantp = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We previously reported that constitutive overexpression of asTF in PT45.P1 cells induces MAPK and Akt phosphorylation [ 7 ]; in this study, MAPK p42/44 phosphorylation levels were unaffected by RabMab1 treatment (data not shown), yet a highly significant decrease in pAKT-T308 was observed ( p = 0.002), while the levels of pAKT-S473 were unaffected (Figure 5C ).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant negative correlation between patients’ body mass index (BMI) and the proportion of patients with ≥12 lymph nodes examined (correlation coefficient r = –0.679, P = 0.002), but no such association was found for the absolute node count (correlation coefficient r = –0.056, P = 0.349).
highly significantP = 0.0020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The positive correlation for subgroup C ( r C = 0.510, N = 33) ( Table 3 ) indicated a highly significant increase in network variability with age (P = 0.002); in contrast, that correlation in subgroup D was negative ( r D = − 0.143, N = 10) but not statistically significant (P = 0.693).
showed a trendp=0.0020.0× alpha
In contrast, the BP slope in the IH patients showed a trend towards a decrease with each hour (−0.3 mmHg/hr) during the first 24 hours, and this change was different from not only the same time period in controls (p=0.002, Figure 1 ), but also when compared to hours 25–44 in the IH patients (p=0.001).