Excerpts

As regards the degree of dehydration, moderate and severe cases were highly significant in groups A and O ( p < 0.005).

For the LBP group, there was a significant reduction in pain score with treatment from a median of 9 to 6 (Wilcoxan, Z = 2.87, p = 0.0041); however, although quality of life measurement changes were similar to the failed back syndrome cohort and showed a trend to improvement this was not statistically significant (Wilcoxan, p > 0.005).

The prevalence of methicillin resistance showed a decreasing trend ( P = 0.005) (See Supplementary Fig. 1, Additional File 1 ).

The overlap in global regulation of gene expression between the mutant form of PPARγ and the PPARγ ligands is highly significant ( p <0.005 for each drug vs. mutation).

Correlation of each factor to the Profilin-1 levels per individual sample did not reach statistical significance for Wnt5b, PLCb4, ANGPT1 with the exception of CREB1 which suprisingly showed a strong inverse correlation (p=0.005; ρ=-0.943, Spearman's Rho) to the PFN1 levels in the pT2 + samples.

At 6 months, it increased to 6.8 ± 0.95 mm with a mean difference of 3.1 ± 0.63 mm and the values obtained were statistically highly significant ( p < 0.005).

All these nuclear size parameters were highly significant in differentiating between benign and malignant cases ( P < 0.005).

By contrast, MUP sharing had a strong and highly significant effect on the likelihood of successful mating ( Table 1 : model 3, p = 0.005; Figure S1 ).

The latter also appears to have a marginally significant positive and negative impact on Breath-Distract (r = 0.292, P = .005) and Breath-Blissfulness (r = −0.279, P = .008), respectively.

A highly significant reduction of tinnitus annoyance (p < 0.005) as measured by the THI score in the interval between admittance to therapy (mean = 27.8) and the end of follow-up (mean = 23.7) was observed in MD patients of group B ( Table III ).

We compared the peak responses of the striosomal and matrix samples during the tone presentation period for the acquisition, post-criterion and overtraining sessions ( Figure 7C ), and found a highly significant interaction (ANOVA interaction p<0.005).

This difference was highly significant (P = 0.005).

There was a highly significant association between laryngotracheobronchoscopic findings and the need for tracheostomy (p = 0.005).

The main effect of verbal communication was highly significant ( F 1,59 = 8.4; p = 0.005).

The comparison of mean values of parameters measured between male and female showed highly significant differences of P < 0.005.

In this context, the mScarlet-based biosensor showed minimal response (0.3 ± 0.2%, n = 11), whereas the stagRFP counterpart showed a clearly significant FRET response (3.3 ± 0.4%, n = 8, p = 0.005, t = 3.642, df = 9) (Fig. 3a ).

For intra-group comparisons across time points, relative to baseline (Test 1), (1) at 20 min post-landscape viewing (Test 2), the BTJQ group showed significantly lower SDNN (ɳ2p = 0.162, p = 0.045) and rMSSD (ɳ2p = 0.137, p = 0.046); (2) immediately after Tai Chi exercise (Test 3), the GTJQ group exhibited significant decreases in SDNN (ɳ2p = 0.112, p = 0.048) and rMSSD (ɳ2p = 0.154, p = 0.047), while the BTJQ and GBTJQ groups showed highly significant decreases in SDNN (ɳ2p = 0.284, p = 0.005; ɳ2p = 0.202, p = 0.007) and rMSSD (ɳ2p = 0.365, p = 0.001; ɳ2p = 0.275, p = 0.006); and (3) during full recovery (Test 4), the BTJQ group still showed significantly lower SDNN (ɳ2p = 0.137, p = 0.042) than baseline.

This difference in labeling was highly significant with p = 0.005.

However, the results remained highly significant (RR = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.79; p = 0.005).

The best concordance with microarray analysis was observed for hsa-miR-143-3p, hsa-miR-205-5p and hsa-miR-4417, which also had highly significant differences in Table 3 (adjusted p values < 0.005).

Improved mean BOP, PPD, and CAL differences were highly significant ( P < 0.005) for the test group at the 6 th week.

The Kaplan–Meier analysis for postoperative visual acuity demonstrated a highly significant difference, with a log‐rank test statistic of 35.98 and a p value of < 0.005 (−log 2 ( p ) = 28.9).

The analyses of the BIS subscales showed that this differential effect was particularly attributable to motor impulsivity (i.e., acting without thinking), where the group*time interaction reached borderline significance ( p = .066, see also Table S4 in Supplement) and post hoc tests indicated a highly significant improvement in the active group ( p = .005) but no significant change in the sham group ( p = .58).

SOCS2 A statistical highly significant correlation was observed between SOCS2 expression and pathological grade (r = -0.306, P = 0.005).

Importantly, timing was highly significant with OS ( P = 0.005), with concurrent chemoradiotherapy providing the majority of the benefit in survival [ 26 ].