Excerpts

However, there was a highly significant correlation between intrarenal and urinary miR-21 levels in the HTN group ( r = 0.831; P = 0.006), but not the IgAN group ( r = 0.259; P = 0.11).

The inter-individual comparison in PD patients between the clinical dominant and non-dominant side showed a highly significant difference of the grey value vessel ratio for veins ( p -value = 0.0060): The non-dominant side showed a lower contrast in veins compared to the dominant side.

A simple slope analysis showed that the main effect was marginally significant for the male group ( b (292) = 2.59, p = .006).

Results The Pearson test has showed a statistically significant correlation between Vol breast and V10, V20, V30 with borderline significance (p = 0.006; p = 0.02; p = 0.05).

However, a highly significant association was observed between dental caries and dental visits (P=0.006), with 17.8% (n=43) of caries patients visiting the dentist compared to 91.8% (n=146) of those without caries.

However, the correlation between HMGT score and level of education was highly significant (r=0.28, p=0.006).

The increase after the DER-diet showed a trend towards higher levels compared to the relative change in the restricted diet ( p = 0.006) and the control group ( p = 0.003) ( Table 2 ).

In the Cox hazard analysis adjusted with IPW, Dur/Tre demonstrated a favorable trend in OS (hazard ratio [HR] <0.75) in patients with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (≥100 ng/mL) (HR 0.72, interaction p = 0.006) or double positive elevation of tumor marker (AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin [≥100 mAU/mL]) (HR 0.66, interaction p = 0.005).

Again using the thresholds ( p value <0.05 and Δβ ≥ 0.1) analysis revealed one nominally significant mQTL for FAM63B_1 (rs4774353 in FOXB1 , chr15:60309674 (hg19), with p value = 0.006 and Δβ = −0.11 for the A allele).

Our second test excluded these poorly sampled countries (i.e., those with fewer than three populations screened) and indicated a highly significant relationship ( n = 23; μ: r = 0.31, P = 0.006).

This relationship remained highly significant when adjusting for starting dose categorically (aHR = 1.717, 95% CI: 1.17, 2.52, P = .006) or continuously (aHR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.14, 2.43, P = .008).

Moreover, when the DRB1 and DQA1-DQB1 alleles were analyzed separately, the frequencies of the DRB1 alleles showed a highly significant difference (log likelihood test, P = 0.006; exact test, P = 0.008) with a large effect size (Wn = 0.38; Table II ).

This difference (about 52.87 min) was highly significant ( P < 0.006) statistically as well as clinically [ Table 4 and Figure 1 ].

On exposure to poly:IC this was not significant, but there was a clear trend (Pam3Cys IL-1β pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.006; Pam3Cys IL-6 pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.037; poly:IC IL-1β pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.058; poly:IC IL-6 pooled patient data versus controls p = 0.115).

Moran's test detected highly significant but weakly positive spatial autocorrelation (Moran statistic I = 0.08, p = .006), meaning that neighboring sites tended to display similar temporal trends.

Nominally significant interactions ( P = 0.006–0.04) were observed between the diet score and WHR-GRS (but not BMI-GRS), two WHR loci ( GRB14 rs10195252; LYPLAL1 rs4846567) and two BMI loci ( LRRN6C rs10968576; MTIF3 rs4771122), for the respective BMI-adjusted WHR or BMI outcomes.

The decrease in HRQOL was significant in the domain of bodily pain (mean difference = -3.7, p = < .001) and borderline significant in the domain of vitality (mean difference = -3.46, p = .006).

Following these caveats, an analysis of the Dorado Outcrop basalt tag OTU library with clone libraries from other geographically-disparate studies reveals a significant trend of an increasing proportion of shared OTUs with sample set age ( p = 0.006; Figure 10 ).

Random intercept for Participant was significant [β = 1.728, SE = 0.086, 95% CI = [1.56, 1.90], t (47.99) = 20.117, p < 0.001] and fixed-effects factor WordOrder was highly significant [β = −0.098, SE = 0.035, 95% CI = [−0.17, −0.03], t (808.19) = −2.78, p = 0.006].

Centring at 24 weeks, the difference in slope is nonsignificant (p = 0.072); at 28 weeks, it becomes significant (p = 0.030) and at 36 weeks is highly significant (p = 0.006).

The difference between the NMES and compression stockings groups was highly significant (p = 0.006) at discharge. 3.2.

which included 23 % of diabetic patients treated with TAPT and 28 % treated with DAPT showed that cilostazol-treated patients with oral hypoglycemic medications experienced a highly significant 63 % reduction in the risk of restenosis ( P < 0.006) [ 21 ].

Additionally, a highly significant microplastic exposure × contestant role interaction was found for the ‘duration of rapping bouts' ( F 1 = 7.73, p = 0.006).

This group’s data were therefore analysed with the Friedman Test, with a highly significant result (Friedman χ 2 = 10.14, p = .006).

The increase was consistent across all three Hoxb regions tested (supplementary Table S2 ) and the difference in modification levels between the VPA-treated and untreated Hox genes was highly significant (H4K8ac, P = 0.006, H3K4me3, P = 0.0008; this and all subsequent comparisons use Student's two-tailed paired t test).