Excerpts

The analysis of the NPI total score between preintervention and postintervention assessments showed a highly significant improvement in the DT group ( Z = 2.66, P = .007).

Considering all the metabolites altogether, the difference was highly significant ( p = 0.007).

As for CS, a highly significant association with perceived quality of meetings was found ( p -value = 0.007), with need to attend training ( p -value = 0.035) and perceiving no risks for the future ( p -value = 0.012) also predicting higher CS levels.

Under a strict Bonferroni correction criteria (α = 0.005), analysis of the combined dataset showed a trend for positive association for WNT3 (rs9890413) in individuals with deep caries and AP, both under allelic and dominant genotype models (P = 0.007).

The cortical coherence of gamma bands between the precuneus and PCC (precuneus-PCC) showed marginally significant difference ( Z = −2.42, p = 0.007, adjusted p = 0.068), suggesting a stronger functional connectivity in the Asy condition.

The effect of fruit status (punctured finger limes, undamaged finger limes, and papaya controls) was highly significant for development of pupae per kg fruit in C. capitata (F 2,11 = 9.1, p = 0.007), Z. cucurbitae (F 2,11 = 6.9, p = 0.01), and B. dorsalis (F 2,11 = 27.5, p < 0.001).

By combining treatment groups, survival analysis according to pathologic response (pCR n = 68; RD n = 88) revealed a highly significant association between pCR and D-DFS, with 4-year D-DFS 93.6% vs 70.9% for pCR vs no-pCR, respectively (HR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.10–0.69, P = 0.007), as shown in Fig. 3 .

Plasma TMB was also a marginally significant predictive factor in univariate analysis for OS; however, higher pTMB (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18–0.76, p = 0.007) was associated with improved OS in the multivariate analysis.

The link between approach and the use of emotive language in the threats was highly significant in the mixed motivations sample: 23 (60.5%): 20 (32.8%), χ 2 = 7.333, p = 0.007, φ = 0.272, OR 3.143 (1.354–7.295), and in the aggrieved sample 10 (76.9%): 6 (26.1%), χ 2 = 8.693, p = 0.003, φ = 0.491, OR 9.444 (1.924–12.645), but not in the relationship-seeking sample: 9 (45%): 4 (28.6%), χ 2 = 0.941, NS, 0.166.

When a more stringent α level based on Bonferroni correction (α = .0017) was applied, most primary outcomes remained statistically significant except for 30-day readmission, which was only marginally significant ( P = .007).

NSSI + BPD patients generally scored higher—in terms of total briefTEMPS-M score—than control participants (NSSI − BPD) and groups differed highly significant only in depressive temperament ( p = 0.007).

Leave-one-out cross-validation applied to the prediction of pathologic response based on utDNA MRD detection in our cohort yielded a highly significant accuracy of 81% ( p = 0.007).

The mean mesiodistal diameter of IF was 3.23 (±1.00) mm and was statistically highly significant among different age groups ( P = 0.007).

Overall, the effects were highly significant at both 5 d ap ( p = 0.007) and 28 d pp ( p = 0.006).

In step 3, the full model was highly significant (adjusted R 2 = 0.353, F = 5.361, P = 0.007).

This difference was highly significant (hazard ratio, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.4–8.6; P = 0.007). 124 This has led to the preparation of a randomised, double-blinded phase II trial ( NCT03018288 ) that is actively recruiting 108 patients with newly diagnosed GBM.

This difference was statistically significant in the middle-aged group ( p <0.001) and approached significance in the oldest age group ( p =0.007).

To prioritize the study, only those spots with a highly significant ( P < 0.007) difference in expression levels were selected for analysis.

Phylogenetic signal was again highly significant, both in MorphoJ ( P = 0.007 each) and K mult (size-corrected) (VA: K mult = 0.72, P = 0.009 and DA: K mult = 0.98, P = 0.001).

Analysis of variance F statistic for the effect of NPWT over 180 days was highly significant (11.482595, p = 0.007).

Games-Howell post hoc tests revealed a trend towards significance with controls (7.1 ± 9.7%) committing less errors than the C + group (18.3 ± 9.7%) (p = 0.007) and the C– group (14.6 ± 9.7%) (p = 0.04).

Leave-one-out cross-validation applied to the prediction of pathologic response based on utDNA MRD detection in our cohort yielded a highly significant accuracy of 81% ( p = 0.007).

Our results showed that the biomarkers of families in roots had some correlations with bacteria from the root itself and the rhizospheric soil based on the RLR of families, such as Enterobacteriacea, which displayed an extremely significant negative correlation with family OC28 ( r = − 0.950, p = 0.007), and Pseudomonadaceae, which showed an extremely significant negative correlation with Nocardioidaceae ( r = − 0.949, p = 0.007) ( Tables S4A & S4B ).

Despite this low response rate, heartburn was a highly significant predictor of the likelihood of success of acid suppression therapy ( p = 0.007) and resulted in a near threefold increase in the success of treatment.

Nominally significant results were observed in individual CpG sites for loss of a parent or caretaker (CpG4 β: -0.719 [-1.239, -0.199], p-value = 0.007 and CpG5 β: -0.626 [-1.237, -0.015], p-value = 0.045).