Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp = 0.0070.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The link between approach and the use of emotive language in the threats was highly significant in the mixed motivations sample: 23 (60.5%): 20 (32.8%), χ 2 = 7.333, p = 0.007, φ = 0.272, OR 3.143 (1.354–7.295), and in the aggrieved sample 10 (76.9%): 6 (26.1%), χ 2 = 8.693, p = 0.003, φ = 0.491, OR 9.444 (1.924–12.645), but not in the relationship-seeking sample: 9 (45%): 4 (28.6%), χ 2 = 0.941, NS, 0.166.
borderline significancep = 0.0070.1× alpha
HALP showed only borderline significance. According to the multivariate Cox regression model, male gender (HR: 2.024; 95% CI: 1.215–3.373; p = 0.007), elevated LAR (HR: 5.271; 95% CI: 2.611–10.641; p < 0.01), and the presence of concomitant bone metastasis (HR: 2.355; 95% CI: 1.262–4.393; p = 0.007) were identified as independent predictors for bone marrow metastasis ( Table 7 ).
In the placebo group, the decrease in TFF2 expression was statistically significant ( p = 0.001), whereas in the probiotic group, despite the reduction, it did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.007).
highly significantP = .0070.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Multivariable-adjusted models that further adjusted for demographics and smoking ( Table 2 ; full results in the eTable in Supplement 1 ) reported attenuated but highly significant associations for moderate exposure (adjusted HR [AHR], 1.86 [95% CI, 1.19-2.91]; P = .007) and severe exposure (AHR, 2.90 [95% CI, 1.69-4.99]; P < .001).
almost significantlyp = 0.0070.1× alpha
These differences mean that having a relative or close friend infected or deceased from COVID-19 predicted almost significantly the emotional processing indexes in the respondents’ writings [IRef: R 2 = 0.112, F (1, 62) = 7.81, p = 0.007, t = −2.80, p = 0.007; IWRAD: R 2 = 0.054, F (1, 62) = 3.56, p = 0.064, t = 1.89, p = 0.064; IWRAD_IWRLL: R 2 = 0.057, F (1, 62) = 3.74, p = 0.058, t = 1.93, p = 0.058].