Highly significant differences were observed between susceptible and resistant UTI groups ( p = 0.00001 and p = 0.000015, respectively), indicating BCG cycles as a key differentiating factor.
Excerpts
In six of the ten disorder/breed combinations (prcd-PRA, Labrador Retriever and Cocker Spaniel; PLL, Miniature Bull Terrier; EF, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel; PRA-rcd4, Gordon Setter and Irish Setter) there was a highly significant difference (P<0.1x10 -4 ) between the observed progeny hereditary genotype frequencies and those expected from random mating of parents (born t-2 to t-4 years) with known genotypes, providing unequivocal evidence of selection.
Phenotypic correlation Highly significant correlations were found between dormancy and GA 3 content in tubers ( P <0.00001).
The Wald test and the likelihood ratio test were highly significant (P<0.00001 for both tests and for either model), and the pseudo-R 2 value and Hosmer and Lemeshow test confirmed the goodness-of-fit of both models.
The difference between the number of reading mistakes before and after the training session was highly significant (Wicoxon Test: p < 0.00001).
In line with these observations, the 2 (task: judge number/mean size) x 2 (unattended magnitude: small/big) repeated measure ANOVA performed on PSEs estimates showed a highly significant interaction between task and magnitude of the unattended dimension (F(1,13) = 52.17, p<10 −5 ), with PSE estimates differing between small and large unattended magnitude only for the average size task (p<10 −5 ) but not for the numerosity task (p = 0.37).
Chlorophyta and Toxoplasma seem to have a significant positive influence on each other ( P < .01), whereas Dictyostelium and Plasmodium seem to have a highly significant positive influence on each other ( P < 10 −5 ).
The overall effect of the combined subgroups (COI and no COI) was also highly significant for patients treated with BEVA ( p < 0.00001).
Despite this heterogeneity, the overall effect size is highly significant ( Z = 30.91, p < .00001).
Also, the presence of two or more risk factors resulted in a highly significant elevation of risk for severe vomiting (OR 15.97; 5.12–49.87; p < 0.00001) (The second table in Section 2.7 ).
The depicted IBD segment in Figure 3 has a highly significant IBD score ( P -value < 1E-5).
Similarly, the liraglutide versus placebo/standard treatment subgroup (Figure 4 ) showed a highly significant reduction in BMI (MD: −1.75 kg/m2; 95% CI: −2.38 to −1.12; p < 0.00001), again with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%), reinforcing the reliability of liraglutide’s effect in weight reduction.
All correlation coefficients between these two datasets were above 0.99 (Pearson’s r ) and highly significant with p < 1e-5.
2012 )—a highly significant difference ( P < 0.00001, χ 2 test).
For a test, we conducted chi 2 tests for some of the variables, but, as assumed, all results were highly significant (e.g., “gender”: chi 2 : 695303.9042, p < .00001).
Genome-wide significance was the accepted P < 5 × 10 −8 while marginal significance was P < 1 × 10 −5 .
A sensitivity analysis for hematocrit revealed a highly significant increase (MD = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.86–2.44; p < 0.00001).
Even after accounting for eye and exam number nested within subjects, MAP accuracy values remained a highly significant predictor of MAIA values, t (1071.9) = 5.03, P < 0.00001.
7c ), the VOPP1 / WWOX ratio was a highly significant variable ( p < 0.00001) with a hazard ratio of 3.2 (95% CI 1.9–5.3).
The overall effect was also highly significant (Z = 5.20, P < 0.00001) (Fig. 4 b).
There was a go highly significant ( p = 0.00001) prevalence of Nab against NFL, IgM and IgG, as well as NFH and GFAP, IgG in MCI patients.
The increments in luciferase activity produced by the addition of increasing amounts of human rMCP-1 to antigen stimulated cells were significant for the allele 1G (ANOVA F = 10.23, p = 0.005) and highly significant for the allele 2G (ANOVA F = 172.3, p <0.00001).
Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium analysis for rs2904880 revealed highly significant deviation from expected genotype counts ( χ 2 = 161.4, df = 1, p < 0.00001), characterized by a marked heterozygote deficit (observed 271 [22.66%] vs. expected 428.36 [35.82%]) and a reciprocal homozygote excess.
This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.00001) in favor of endovascular coiling [ Figure 3a ].
Most babies (66/74, 89%) experienced a fall in their z -score between stoma formation and reversal, and this growth failure was highly significant ( P < 0.00001, paired Wilcoxon signed-rank analysis).