Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 10 −50.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The Fst values were relatively high and reached highly significant levels (p < 10 −5 ) between populations from Tak (all collection periods) and Yala-Narathiwat (21.75%), and between Ubon Ratchathani and Yala-Narathiwat (19.44%), implying genetic differentiation or limited gene flow between these endemic areas.
highly significantp <0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Besides, we use the Pearson Chi-Square test to evaluate the distribution of FIGO stages I, II, III, IV among expansile and infiltrative tumors, and found there was a highly significant association between tumor type and FIGO staging (Pearson chi2(3) = 110.9206, p <0.00001) Figure 4D . 3.3.4 Publication bias Publication bias was investigated by Begg’s funnel plots.
highly significantp<0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, when considering the combination of adding CBCL+BPRS, this yielded a strong increase in prediction accuracy that was highly significant compared to considering only the SIPS (MSE of SIPS=0.74±0.62, MSE of SIPS+BPRS+CBCL=0.716±0.59, p<0.00001) or separately adding BPRS (p<0.00001), or CBCL (p<0.00001) (see Figure 3C ).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Seven other RSA traits were modified in both IL99 and Ruta reflecting the common response to LN (Figure 3a–g ) but showed a highly significant change in IL99 ( p < 0.00001) and lower significance in Ruta, including maximum number of roots*, number of root tips, total root length*, network area*, volume, surface area, and holes* (i.e., traits marked with* were advantageous in IL99 over Ruta under the LN treatment (Figure 3a–g ).
highly significantp < 0.000010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Three homogenous studies reporting procalcitonin documented a highly significant value ( p < 0.00001) with a I 2 value of 57% and odd ratio of 5.77 (95%CI: 3.35, 9.95) beyond the cut off value of 0.1 ng/mL [ Figure 6b ].[ 14 , 15 , 20 ] Investigation of heterogeneity Heterogeneity was found in all the comparisons with I 2 value ranging from 56% to 99% [ Table 3 ].