As illustrated in Figure 1B , in the mixed ANOVA run on mean correct RTs, the critical interaction between alignment and congruency was highly significant, F (1,127) = 14.6, p < 0.0001, η 2 = 0.10, MSE = 174.
Excerpts
Variance analyses showed that the effects of population, photoperiod treatment and population × photoperiod treatment interaction on days to bolting, days to flowering, rosette leaf number, and flower stem length were highly significant ( P ≤ 0.0001; Supplementary Table S2 ).
All correlations between the FIQR total score and MAU instruments utility scores were highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with magnitudes larger than 0.5.
Genotypic differentiation between the two populations was highly significant overall ( P <0.0001), as well as for four out of the seven loci (JS183, JS188, SKTg19, and SKTg22; Table 1 ).
Note: all source model terms are highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001) but the pseudo-R2 is quite low (main road: 0.15; railway: 0.12; highway: 0.10).
The difference between the 2 groups was highly significant ( P < .0001).
GDF-15 showed the most robust response, with highly significant main effects for both time and dose and a strong interaction ( p < 0.0001).
Results A systematic retrospective analysis of the mapping performance comparing the operator with simulated search processes by the algorithm within 17 electroanatomic maps of focal spreading arrhythmias revealed a highly significant reduction of necessary LAT measurements from 55 ± 8.8 to 10 ± 0.51 (n = 17; P < .0001).
However, even if the strict Bonferroni correction had been applied for the 3 variables, all the relevant p -values would still have been highly significant as they are mostly p < 0.0001.
This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
The difference between the two groups was highly significant (Mann–Whitney Rank Sum test p = 0.0001).
Given the large sample size and the highly significant X2 of the maximum likelihood ratio (p < 0.0001), this model was judged to have adequate fit for determining association.
The overall effect was also quite significant (p<0.0001), which indicated that plasma Aβ42:Aβ40 ratio had the ability to be a biomarker for distinguishing people with PET (+) and PET (−) as well.
manillensis , the Friedman test revealed a highly significant overall difference in the expression levels of the three lefaxin genes (Chi-Square = 51.063, df = 2, p < 0.0001).
Effect of nymphal age on the spirochete load of infected nymphs The mean spirochete load of the 1-month-old nymphs ( n = 43, mean: 14,094, 95% confidence interval (CI): 13,508–14,705 spirochetes per nymph) was 7.05 times larger than that of the 4-month-old nymphs ( n = 42, mean: 1999, 95% CI: 1900–2103 spirochetes per nymph) and this difference was highly significant ( t = 12.768, df = 41, P < 0.0001).
The PR-A / PR-B ratio was significantly increased after 6 h in vitro culture ( p = 0.0487) and highly significant beyond 24 h culture ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 1(d) ). 3.2.
Results: Highly significant ( p = 0.0001) differences among means of elastic, viscoelastic and viscoplastic compliance values were found as a function of materials.
The log-rank test indicated a highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001) when the PrC-210 survival curves were compared to their respective vehicle-treated groups (i.e., fasted or fed).
In the vaccine arm, the IFN-γ secreting T cells increased in 14/15 pts and in case of pt #013 they were already high in the PRE sample and remained unchanged in the POST1 sample The difference between IFN-γ secreting T cells in PRE and POST1 samples was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.0001).
RESULTS: Diabetic patients showed highly significant decrease in the level of visfatin compared to the control group (P = 0.0001).
This difference was already highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The miro1 (+/−) / miro2-2 (−/−) plants showed highly significant (P<0.0001) additional impairment of pollen tube growth compared to the miro1 (+/−) alone ( Figure 6 ).
Multiple linear regression model fits and β coefficients for V R were highly significant for each of the intelligibility indices and were best for RT 60 (R 2 = 0.666, F(2, 37) = 39.9, P < .0001).
This analysis revealed highly significant main effects of dose (F 4,160 ≈ 848.5, p < 0.0001), wavelength (F 1,160 ≈ 252.2, p < 0.0001), and cellular age-status (F 1,160 ≈ 1466.8, p < 0.0001), indicating that metabolic activity varied significantly with PBM fluence, irradiation source, and replicative aging.
A p value < 0.05 was considered significant, a p value < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and a p value < 0.0001 was considered extremely significant.