elegans lineage remains highly significant under the new classification ( P <0.0001, compared with 10,000 random lineages with the same lineage tree structure; Fig.
Excerpts
These differences in spatial distributions are highly significant (p < 0.0001, two-tailed one-sample t test, n = 24, see Experimental Procedures ).
Overall, there was a highly significant difference ( P < .0001) in the number of platelets in equivalent volumes of the liver tissue between naive and refractory animals ( Figure 3 B).
There was a highly significant relationship between SNP source and true/false-positive SNP outcome (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.0001); SNPs from non-genic single-copy BESs had a higher chance of being true-positive (58.3%) than those from genic BESs (47.0%).
There was a significant trend towards an increasing use of VATS over time (χ2 = 41.85, P <0.0001; Figure 2A ).
The mixed-effects model analysis indicates highly significant effects of time, treatment groups, and their interaction on hepatocyte viability ( p < 0.0001 for all).
All clinical outcome scores except for the FJS-12 reflected excellent results with highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) between the preoperative and postoperative follow-up scores.
A chi-square test confirmed that these regional differences were highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
The interaction between species and nest floor area was highly significant ( F 3,3436 = 115.12, P < 0.0001), implying that clutch size was related to nest floor area in a species-specific manner.
Thus, during the transition from pole to brain control in task 1, the average correlated firing between pairs of cortical neurons, measured in terms of correlation coefficient (mean ± SEM), increased from 0.02 ± 1 × 10 −4 to 0.06 ± 2 × 10 −4 , a 3-fold rise that was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.0001).
The non-producer strains grew more quickly on the non-demanding control media while the antibiotic-producers grew more quickly on the demanding Pseudonocardia -infused media, producing a highly significant statistical interaction effect ( n = 975, χ 2 = 45.86, df = 2, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4 ).
When lineages were partitioned into four groups (background, fossorial, limbless, and limbless-fossorial), the differences remained highly significant when all genes were analyzed together (p < 0.0001; see Table S3 ).
Specifically, the following variables demonstrated highly significant ( p < 0.0001): age, sex, race, depression, household income poverty rate, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease, health insurance status, smoking status, marital status, educational level, hypertension, body mass index, and number of COVID-19 vaccinations received.
There was a highly significant difference, however, with NTX-PO versus XR-NTX in terms of percent of patients who maintained a prescription for at least 80% of the study days (8% vs. 21%; P < 0.0001).
The treatment difference of 14.1% (95% CI 8.2, 19.2) was highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
One-way ANOVA exhibited a significant trend ( P < 0.0001) between the control and 8 Gy of radiation.
Notwithstanding the smaller sample size at FP + 14, the platelet increase observed at FP + 14 was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Treatment with specific SARS-CoV-2 peptides led to a highly significant increased IFN-γ-release (3.93 ± 0.71 IU/mL vs. 0.34 ± 0.10 IU/mL; p < 0.0001) in convalescents compared to unstimulated whole blood.
5D , statistical analysis confirmed that CAS-FLIER effectively discriminated HIV patients from HC with highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001), which was consistent with qRT-PCR ( P < 0.0001).
A highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001, effect size = 0.319) is observed between protein–protein (Peptide = 0) and protein–peptide (Peptide = 1) complexes ( Figure 1 b), with a noticeably lower median affinity for the latter.
The model fit was highly significant, even after Bonferroni correction ( p < 0.0001), for predicting the mean graft survival time after finishing the six-month evaluation period.
From 2007 to 2010, parasite genotype had a much stronger effect on parasite clearance half-life (p<0·0001) than it had between 2001 and 2004, and remained highly significant after adjusting for other covariates ( F =5·219, df=118, p<0·0001).
This was significant only for gata2b u 5008/ u 5008 , but Pearson’s correlation was highly significant across genotypes (Pearson correlation −0.77, p < 0.0001).
Dynamics of SDE across days and locations Despite randomized target orientations across trials, rendering past orientations irrelevant to current judgments, serial dependence biases remained strong and highly significant across all training days (p<0.0001 for each day; Figure 4A ).
Additionally, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders show a noticeable difference, completely absent in Cohort 1 but representing 1% of Cohort 2, with this difference being highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Table 2 ).