Cox proportional hazards models using splines showed a highly significant relationship between the high probability and high risk of an outcome ( p <0.0001).
Excerpts
A highly significant QTL (p < 0.0001) was detected on chromosome Z between microsatellite markers MCW258 and MCW241 (at 21.40 Mb and 34.26 Mb, respectively) [see Additional file 1 ].The effect of this locus was 15.28 HU.
did not reach statistical significancep < 0.0001
Although the primary analysis did not reach statistical significance, the update analysis showed an OS benefit of apalutamide (median OS not reached v 52.2 mos; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.53–0.79; p < 0.0001) despite crossover that was allowed in the study [ 209 ].
The fixed effects of both sonographer and expert were highly significant for either left or right ovary (joint p<0.0001 always, Table 1 ).
Single‐sample analysis The paired t ‐test analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) when comparing scores before and after the prosection activity.
A repeated measures ANOVA of attractiveness ratings for covered, partially covered, and uncovered displays with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed a highly significant main effect, F (1.27, 75.04) = 23.99, p < .0001, η p 2 = .29.
A slight increase in potassium (within normal reference ranges) was significant ( P < .05) and decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were highly significant ( P < .0001).
Increasing education displayed a strong trend (Cochran-Armitage Trend Test, p<0.0001) with increasing levels of education associated with increased use of condoms, such that compared to men with less than four years of education, men with post-high school education were 13 times more likely to reported higher levels of condom use.
In total, 2 of 15 transient lineages carry longitudinally persistent and induced prophages, while 9 of 9 persistent lineages carry such prophages, and a Fisher’s exact test indicates a highly significant association between inducible phage and persistence of lineage ( P < .0001).
For all immunological outcomes, the interaction term between groups*visits were highly significant (p<0.0001); suggesting significant variation in antibody kinetics between groups.
A substantial proportion of genetic variation was related to differences among groups (SSR, 8.85%; Cyt b , 47.45%; CR, 44.03%), with highly significant F ST values (SSR, F ST = 0.0612, P < 0.0001; Cyt b , F ST = 0.5291, P < 0.0001; CR, F ST = 0.5792, P < 0.0001) ( Wright, 1978 ) ( Table 3 ).
Group 2- TrP treatment with bupivacaine injection + migraine treatment There was a significant trend for reduction of number and intensity of migraine attacks and, in parallel, also of symptomatic drug consumption (ANOVA: p < 0.0001) (Figs. 1 , 2 ).
The primary endpoint at week 24 showed a highly significant reduction in gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing brain MRI lesions with ocrelizumab treatment vs placebo; the number of Gd-enhancing lesions was 89% ( p < 0.0001) lower in the 600 mg ocrelizumab group than in the placebo group, and 96% ( p < 0.0001) lower in the 2000 mg group [ 3 ].
Results and discussion The Procrustes ANOVA performed on the replicated subsample showed highly significant differences between sperm heads (MS sperms = 0.000388, MS error = 0.000001, P < 0.0001).
np is the number of parameters in the model; lnL is the log likelihood score; AIC (Akaike Information criterion = −2*lnL+2*np) is a measure of the goodness of fit of an estimated statistical model; ω is the nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution ratio; LR is the likelihood ratio: df is the degree of freedom in LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test); *** Highly significant (p-value<0.0001).
Importantly, the benchmark NRF2 signature curated by Polonen and colleagues [ 42 ] revealed a highly significant enrichment in the SOCS1-low/SOCS3-high HCC group (NES = 1.4661141; p = 1 × 10 −4 ; p . adjusted = 5 × 10 −4 ) ( Figure 4 e).
R6/2-PBS mice was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) ( Figure 4 A,B).
Similarly, the proportion of converted cytosines in CpG dinucleotides in experimental versus control samples was highly significant (Fisher exact test: P = 0.0001).
A highly significant positive correlation ( ρ = 0.95, P < 0.0001) between expression levels and the normalized difference between ω mus and ω cas ( δ ω ) provides confirmatory support for our results ( fig. 3 B ).
CFR among partially vaccinated is four times more than the CFR in unvaccinated, and the difference is statistically highly significant (p = 0.0001) ( Table 1 ).
Analysis of all completers and withdrawals showed a strong trend over time ( p < 0.0001), and a difference in rate of change between groups (delayed-image: −0.50 kg, early-image: −0.27 kg, p = 0.0008).
After excluding asystole patients with presumed CO = 0 L/min, the association between PetCO 2 and CO remained highly significant ( P < 0.0001).
Results The median value of HBD-3 gene expression on skin lesion in leprosy patients was 260.61 (0.19–3734.10); normal skin in leprosy patients was 1.91 (0.01–151.17); household contacts skin was 7.93 (0.27–121.10); and healthy individuals’ skin was 1.00 (1.00–1.00) is highly significant difference ( p < 0.0001).
However, using Spearman’s correlation analysis, a highly significant (P < 0.0001) moderate to strong positive correlation (r = 0.42 – 0.64) was detected between the five P. copri strains ( Figure 3B ).
There was a highly significant difference in the seroprevalence of NDV in the examined chickens among different villages of the two localities (χ 2 = 24.477, p = 0.0001) ( Table-2 ).