Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
marginally significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Those shifts ranged from a modest four-percentage-point increase in support of legalization to a substantial 12-point jump in the share who said it us “safe for pit bulls to live in residential neighborhoods.” The differences in percentages from 2014 to 2018 for the first three questions in Figure 1 are all highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the four-point difference in support for legalization shown in the final column of the figure is marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant negative relationship (p < 0.0001) between the proximity of consecutive foraging sites at pair level and the mean invertebrate abundance, suggesting that snowfinches return to the same patch also when the mean invertebrate abundance is high, while the opposite trend was found in relationship to invertebrate richness.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant differences among the three tissue types (F = 152.63, p < 0.0001), with multiple comparison analysis showing significant differences between cancellous bone and knee cartilage, cancellous bone and muscle, and knee cartilage and muscle (all p < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the active rTMS group, the mean number of correct answers on the PRM test increased by 4.54 ± 2.98 from baseline to week 8, while the correct number in the sham group decreased slightly (-0.92 ± 2.72) and the difference between these changes was highly significant (mean 5.46 ± 0.92, 95%CI: 3.43–7.14, F = 33.3, df = 137, P < 0.0001, effect size = 0.474) (Table 2 ).
a significant trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
Results Researchers are paying more attention to sex and gender Analysis of data collected from 39,390 applications submitted to CIHR’s investigator-initiated programme across 15 competitions over the past 10 years (median number of applications submitted for each competition; n = 2,484; Min: n = 2183; Max: n = 3813) revealed a significant trend in the proportion of applicants reporting that sex and gender was integrated in their research proposals ( p value for linear trend for sex and gender = p < 0.0001).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Postmortem histopathological analyses at 35 days post‐SCI confirmed improved outcomes with higher IVIg doses, with highly significant reductions in lesion volumes following treatment with either 0.5 g/kg (31% reduction; P < 0.0001), 1 g/kg (34% reduction; P < 0.0001), or 2 g/kg IVIg (27% reduction; P < 0.0001).
a clear trendp < 0.00010.0× alphagold
From 5 to 7 dpf, we can see a clear trend in WT siblings of increasing cascade size ( Figure 5 A; p < 0.0001, p = 0.4554, and p = 0.0001 for 5 dpf versus 6 dpf, 6 dpf versus 7 dpf, and 5 dpf versus 7 dpf, respectively, KS test) and duration ( Figure 5 B; p < 0.0001, p = 0.4554, and p = 0.0001 for 5 dpf versus 6 dpf, 6 dpf versus 7 dpf, and 5 dpf versus 7 dpf, respectively, KS test).