Moreover, miR-374b was found to have highly significant overall complementarity with the consensus sequence ( P <7.3e−04).
Excerpts
Similarly, levofloxacin resistance was observed in all EEC isolates (100%, n = 53) but in 81.0% ( n = 34) of APEC isolates, showing a highly significant difference ( p =0.000731).
In our study, rs41409056 in SLCO1B1 locus, showed marginal significance with p -value = 0.0007376.
24 hpi We identified no significantly enriched GO terms at 24 hpi that met our criteria ( q < 0.05); however, the term “oxidoreductase activity, acting on the CH–CH group of donors” was marginally significant ( p = 0.000739 and q = 0.06498).
Overall, the interaction between MeAnSpring and MAT levels was also highly significant (LR Chisq = 14.4, P -value = 7.4e−4), suggesting DOY is dependent on the interaction between the interannual spring variation (e.g. anomalies) and the local historical temperatures from 1895 to 2022.
This SNP accounted for a maximum trait variance of 1.83% in PROP paper and showed a weaker but nominally significant association with the perception of PROP solution (P = 7.4e-4).
The statistical difference in endosome diameter between FUSwt and FUS501 was highly significant ( P -value=0.00074), but only a tendency between wild-type and FUS501 ( P -value=0.098) ( Fig. 4 B).
In the case of TNF stimulation, dasatinib caused a modest but statistically significant ( P = .013, n = 9) inhibition at as little as a 50nM concentration, whereas in case of C5a stimulation, a robust and highly significant ( P = .00074; n = 6) inhibition was achieved by 100nM dasatinib.
We found no significant protein biomarkers in stage II, although there were two antibodies (YAP_pS127 and STAT5-alpha) with marginal significance (nominal p = 7.5×10 −4 and p adjust = 0.083 for YAP_pS127; nominal p = 8.9×10 −4 and p adjust = 0.083 for STAT5-alpha).
The overlap of ECACC-6 with Nf1 -Mouse-12 was highly significant ( P = 7.5 × 10 -4 ) as well as the overlap between two human groups ( P = 1.2 × 10 -3 ).
The association between this variant and ACR levels also remained highly significant in the replication study ( p -value = 0.000751).
Additionally, patients with high RUNX2 mRNA expression showed marginally significant event-free survival compared to those with low RUNX2 expression (raw p -value=7.56×10 -4 , Bonferroni p -value=0.055) (Figure 9B). miR-378, a microRNA, antagonizes RUNX2 mRNA and protein expression in SCC cell lines ( 46 ).
Most of the values were highly significant after correction for multiple tests (a = 0.05, p = .000758) as shown in Table 2 . 3.3 Population structure Factorial correspondence analysis showed the geographical clustering of the 12 sampled meadows (Figure 2 ) into 4 distinct clusters: (NE) north‐eastern Aegean, (N) North Aegean, (NW) north‐western/(CW) central‐western Aegean, and (SE) south‐eastern‐Cyprus.
However, when the analyses were restricted to the 115 patients who subsequently received chemotherapy (adjuvant or salvage) using multiple gene sets representing the NF‐κB pathway, we observed a highly significant association ( P = 0.00076) with disease‐specific survival as well as a significant association ( P = 0.017) with overall survival (Fig. 1J,K ).
In relation to the IgM, the highly significant McNemar test p -value = 0.00076 indicates that the FIA and CLIA tests convey different information and are not interchangeable, with a very high significance.
The difference was found to be highly significant (p = 7.6600e-04), and MiF outperformed the other graph similarity coefficients.
Regarding heat-treated preparations (TH), the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed highly significant differences among bacterial strains for both fungi (M3 M. laxa : χ 2 = 14.3, df = 2, p = 0.000769; VV081 C. fioriniae : χ 2 = 15.4, df = 2, p = 0.000446).
When the comparison was performed within each grade, grades 1 and 2 showed highly significant positive correlations between these losses ( p = 0.00077 and p = 0.0093, respectively), while grade 3 did not show any and grade 4 showed a weak but significant correlation ( p = 0.044) (Fig. 7b and Supplementary Fig. 7 ).
A significant difference in reaction times was found between Byblis -1 (C&M) and Byblis -2 (C) (one-way analysis of variance, F(3.36) = 7.779, p = 0.0353206, Tukey HSD post-hoc testing); very significant differences were found between Byblis -1 (C) and Bybils -2 (C&M) (One-way Analysis of Variance, F(3,36) = 7.779, p = 0.0046993, Tukey HSD post-hoc testing); and extremely significant differences were found between Byblis -1 (C&M) and Byblis -2 (C&M) (One-way Analysis of Variance, F(3,36) = 7.779, p = 0.0007705, Tukey HSD post-hoc testing).
To identify a focused subset of plasticity genes likely to be regulated by LPS (regardless of age or specific brain region) to test in vivo , we investigated a highly significant molecular match between the juvenile plasticity signature and an adult brain-derived LPS transcriptome ( GSE3253 ; rank #14, p = 7.9 × 10 −4 e ; empirical p value calculated using molecular match algorithm; Fig. 3a ; Table 3 ).
In FRDA patients, significant correlations were found between HMM state 4 MLT and the mean within‐DMN rsFC (MLT, R = 0.79, p = .00023), a strong trend for correlation between HMM state 4 FO and the mean within‐DMN rsFC (FO, R = 0.75, p = .00079) as well as a trend between HMM state 4 and 5 power levels and the mean within‐DMN rsFC (State 4 power level, R = −0.58, p = .016; State 5 power level, R = 0.56, p = .021).
In the case of mating with the non-irradiated males, on the first day, mating occurrence started at low levels (21.5 ± 1.5%) and then showed a positive trend until the end of the experiment (interaction non-irradiated*day 3: Wald = 11.26, p = 0.00079).
We found a highly significant positive correlation between CGI density and number of chromosome pairs in a genome ( r = 0.88, P = 7.9 × 10 -4 ; Figure 1a ) and a significant correlation between CGI density and number of chromosome arms ( r = 0.62, P = 0.037).
This overlap is highly significant (OR = 2.0, p = 0.0008, Fisher’s exact test).
5A ), the difference between the HC and PC groups remains highly significant ( p = 0.0008), and the p value for the difference between the PC and mild AD groups decreases ( p = 0.0218 versus 0.0963 in Fig. 5A ).