Barely Significant
← all phrases

a decreasing trend

47,181 sentences · 47,181 papers · 77,245 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a decreasing trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.061.2× alphaplainly factual
In contrast, the expression level of arginase-1, an M2-type microglial marker, was significantly reduced in OBX mice, while TGF-β exhibited a decreasing trend that did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.06; Fig. 4 J and K).
a decreasing trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
These data imply that in BMP9-cultured cartilage pellets, the interactions between proteoglycan and water are somehow different; measuring the hydration of mature pellets showed a decreasing trend, 91.8% ± 0.88% versus 88.6% ± 0.85% water ( ANOVA, p = 0.06) between control and BMP9-cultured pellets, mirroring the decrease in the water content of cartilage as it matures.
a decreasing trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Rumen Fermentation Parameters As shown in Figure 2 , compared to RTW, the concentrations of acetate ( p = 0.04), propionate ( p < 0.01), isobutyrate ( p = 0.02), and T-VFAs ( p < 0.01) in the rumen fluid of HW significantly increased, while the ratio of acetate to propionate showed a decreasing trend ( p = 0.06) of HW. 3.3.
almost significantP = .061.2× alphagold
a decreasing trendP = .071.4× alphagold
A decreasing trend in overall hospitalization rate within the PA − group was seen preisolation ( P = .07) with an almost significant difference from the PA + group ( P = .06); however, no significant changes in slope or level within either group were seen within the pre- and postisolation segments ( Figure 3 , Table 4 ).
a decreasing trendP = 0.0601.2× alphagold
Also in contrast to the effects of Mtrr gt homozygosity in females and of maternal Mtrr gt heterozygosity, the RBCs of these wildtype F1 females showed a decreasing trend in mean corpuscular volume compared to C57Bl/6 controls ( P = 0.060, Fig. 7 A ) and were less variable in size compared to C57Bl/6 controls as demonstrated by a lower RBC distribution width ( P = 0.04; Fig. 7 A and B ).