Barely Significant
← all phrases

a marginal trend

67 sentences · 67 papers · 885 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

There is a marginal trend for GMRs to be closer to 1 using the FLUCOP protocol. %GCVs show a similar result ( Figure 4B ), with slightly lower (but not statistically significant) %GCVs for FLUCOP testing with the B strains, but little or no difference for H1N1 and H3N2 testing. 3.2.6 Impact of using ether split antigen for B virus HAI testing Laboratories testing B viruses used a mixture of native antigen and ether split antigen in their assays.
Participants showed a marginal trend toward a significant decrease in NPS ratings of pain severity collected prior to and following the intervention (mean NPS ± SD PRE Intervention: 40.6 ± 15; mean NRS ± SD POST Intervention: 25.0 ± 16; t = 2.408, df = 6, p = 0.053; Figure 3 , individual NPS values are represented in Table 2 ).
Although there are no significant differences between the compositions, there is a marginal trend across all the absorbing gases towards higher abundances in the baseline model (which allows for a temperature inversion).
Methane emission from a cool brown dwarf.
Nature · 2024 · PMC11023930
We observed a marginal trend, yet not statistically significant, between the concentration of ICTP and the development of metastases, as these patients demonstrated higher concentrations compared to those not developing metastasis [3.2 μg/L (2.4–10.0 μg/L) vs. 2.9 μg/L (1.1–17.0 μg/L), Mann–Whitney test p = 0.05].
For the Quad model, there was a marginal trend of linear moderation, and a trend of quadratic moderation, on consistency by the categorical order of time interval length for Overcoming Bias, Q M (4) = 18.714, p = .001; β Linear = −.239, SE Linear = 0.126, p Linear = 0.059; β Quadratic = −.303, SE Quadratic = .109, p Quadratic = .006, which suggests that Overcoming Bias may initially decrease and then increase in consistency over time.
There is a marginal trend towards higher failure rates in males, but given the heterogeneity and variability in effect sizes, this finding should also be interpreted with caution. 4.3 Effect of the side of the implant on the OMIs failure rate This subsection focuses on the effect of the insertion site (left vs. right side) on the OMIs failure rate.
The sex-by-SES trajectory interaction terms did not show any significant association, and only the interaction between men and a stably low SES trajectory showed a marginal trend of association with Δage ( p for interaction = 0.1; Table S3 ), which was confirmed in sex-stratified analyses (β (CI) = 0.35 (−0.39 to 1.08) in men vs. 1.02 (0.34 to 1.70) in women; ( Table S4 )).