Barely Significant
← all phrases

a significant trend

4,889 sentences · 4,889 papers · 46,430 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

a significant trendP = 0.010.2× alphagold
Compared to Q1, the Q2 and Q4 groups showed significantly reduced risk in 1-year stroke recurrence (Q2: HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79, P = 0.005; Q4: HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81, P = 0.007), with a significant trend across all quartiles ( P = 0.01 for trend tests).
a significant trendP < 0.010.2× alphagold
However, this better prognosis was time dependent with a significant trend toward late recurrence with ILC compared to IDC ( P < 0.01). 3 Rakha et al 4 showed that ILC has an indolent but progressive clinical course with nearly linear survival curves which cross those of IDC after approximately 10 years of follow up, thus eventually exhibiting a worse long-term outcome.
a significant trendP < 0.010.2× alphagold
The average changes in ln(UACR) for participants in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles relative to the reference quartile were respectively − 0.06, 0.08, and 0.22, presenting a significant trend ( P < 0.01).
a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
There was also a significant trend ( p < 0.01) in prevalence of lower respiratory symptoms that improved when away from the building: 52% of those with postoccupancy-onset asthma, 41% of those with adult preoccupancy-onset asthma, 27% of those with childhood asthma, and 23% of those with no physician-diagnosed asthma ( Table 4 ).
a significant trendp < 0.010.2× alphagold
Multivariable analysis revealed a significant trend of low GCS ( p < 0.01), age over 80 years ( p < 0.01), DC ( p < 0.01), EVD placement ( p < 0.01), tracheotomy ( p < 0.01), and hypertension ( p < 0.01) After repeated operations (OR 2.199), tracheotomy (OR 7.219) can be used to predict the unfavorable outcomes strongly and independently.
a significant trendP = 0.010.2× alphagold
The results demonstrate a significant trend in pain changes in the exercise group (F (2, 24) = 5.31, P = 0.01, η 2 = 0.31), while it is not significant in the control group (F (2, 30) = 0.57, P = 0.57, η 2 = 0.04).