“a trend toward significance”

This correlation returned a trend toward significance (rho = −0.401, p = 0.052). 4.

The fixed-effects test for the subgroup differences suggests a trend toward significance (statistic = 4.00, df = 1, p = 0.052).

7 m-TUG After the intervention, the SC exhibited an increase in speed by 0.1 m/s (95% CI [− 0.15 to − 0.02], p = 0.011), which was significant; there was also a trend toward significance in the duration of turns (p = 0.052).

Increased expression of CD163 in MUS from HV-MEC fetuses showed a trend toward significance ( p = 0.052) relative to both CON and UNIF groups.

Among patients with known CAD, the difference in MACE rates between patients with elevated PWV and those with non-elevated PWV showed a trend toward significance, but it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.053).

The listhesis grade had a trend toward significance among study groups ( P = 0.053), with a significant difference observed for a lower percentage of grade I cases and a higher percentage of grade II cases in the Sacralization group compared to the No LSTV group ( P = 0.009 and P = 0.020, respectively).

In addition, a trend toward significance was found in ATF6 (Fig. 8 B, p = 0.053).

The main effect of sleep on SOL was not significant ( p > 0.05), but there was a trend toward significance between the baseline and 2nd SR ( p = 0.053).

Although in EO Static Balance Index was highly correlated with Equilibrium Score ( r = 0.416; p = 0.006), correlation between Static Balance Index and Strategy Score was moderate, with only a trend toward significance ( r = 0.295; p = 0.054).

The findings remained significant after correction for multiple testing (Table 2 ), except that the relation with Ng only reached a trend toward significance ( P = 0.054).

Nevertheless, these histological characteristics showed a trend toward significance in our analysis (Chi-Square, p = 0.054 and p = 0.096, respectively).

Neurofunctional tests at 15 days indicated a trend toward significance in absolute discrimination (p = 0.054), with the control group showing higher mean values (5.5, SD = 3.1) than the treatment group (-1, SD = 5.1).

There was also a trend toward significance for neuropathy, with 91.4% of patients who did not heal presenting with neuropathy compared with 76.9% of patients who went on to heal (p=0.054).

When considering between‐groups comparisons post‐exercise, there were no significantly different metabolites between hot and temperate conditions, with only 2‐hydroxyisovalerate showing a trend toward significance in hot conditions ( P = 0.055). 3.3.

4 mg/kg-naloxone pretreatment in vehicle-treated mice indicated a main effect of naloxone on open zone occupancy (naloxone > vehicle; F 1,34 = 7.166, p = 0.0114), but not open zone entries ( F 1,34 = 2.826, p = 0.1019) and a trend toward significance for total distance traveled ( F 1,34 = 3.937, p = 0.0554).

5 j), but a trend toward significance between soluble Aβ 42 and ACh (Fig. 5 k; r 11 = − 0.5421, P = 0.0556).

In our study, the presence of livestock in the vicinity of crocodile farms did not pose a significant risk factor but only a trend toward significance (P = 0.056).

A trend toward significance (p = 0,056) was observable on a measure of narrative organization (i.e.

Extension stiffness—calculated from Test 7—was significantly higher in Group 1 (Straight) versus all other groups ( p ≤ 0.015), with a trend toward significance in Group 2 (Nail) versus Group 4 (90°-Helical) ( p = 0.057) and in Group 3 (45°-Helical) versus Group 4 (90°-Helical) ( p = 0.059), and with no significant difference between Group 2 (Nail) and Group 3 (45°-Helical) ( p = 0.989).

The analyses revealed a trend toward significance for the main effect of Genuineness ( F [1,1446] = 3.62, p = 0.057) as posed emotions are generally rated as more intense than genuine ones (3.95 vs. 3.75).

The correlation between the Y‐BOCS total score and accuracy during switch condition showed a trend toward significance ( p = .057, r = .296).

HDL levels showcased a trend toward significance (Wald = 3.58, p = 0.058), featuring an OR of 1.087 (95% CI: 0.99–1.18).

Looking at the subgroups, there was a significant difference for the emmetropic eyes group ( p = 0.003) respectively a trend toward significance ( P = 0.058), when only one eye per patient is included.

Additionally, hypokalemia showed a trend toward significance with an odds ratio of 3.31 (95% CI: 0.96–11.42, p = 0.058) in the univariate analysis.

Under the ToM condition in the RMET, the RTs showed a trend toward significance for the main effect of Time ( p = 0.058) and interaction of Time × Group ( p = 0.050), but not for the main effect of Group ( p = 0.538).