Barely Significant
← all phrases

borderline significance

3,928 sentences · 3,928 papers · 11,068 search hits before verification

In the literature

borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
A linear regression analysis suggested that there was only a marginal effect of the proportion of EZH2-expressing tumor cells on the crude disease-free survival of young patients, with borderline significance (F(1,66) = 3.95, p = 0.05, with an R 2 = 0.06 and a regression coefficient of −0.4); thus, the one percent increase in the proportion of EZH2-expressing cells might be related to a 0.4-month decrease in the predicted DFS with great scatter in the data.
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
EFS at 2 years showed borderline significance (RR 1.18, 95% CI: 1.00–1.38; p = 0.05) and 5 years follow-up (RR 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01–1.24; p = 0.04) were significantly higher in Busulfan–Fludarabine, though 1-year EFS was not significantly different between the two groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.97–1.25; p = 0.15) (Table S3).
borderline significanceP=0.0501.0× alpha
In multivariable logistic regression analysis, SUVmax remained independently associated with grade 3 [odds ratio (OR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13–1.38, P<0.001], whereas 3D-CTR showed only borderline significance (OR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00–1.02, P=0.050).
borderline significanceP < .051.0× alpha
However, when adjusting for covariates, none of the cohorts of interest were associated with having a statistically significant difference in ADL difficulty, although borderline significance was seen for having stage III/IV difficulty when comparing nAMD vs control (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.00; P < .05) ( Figure 2 ).
borderline significancep = 0.0501.0× alpha
However, among rural-dwelling males, Poor HLST (B = 0.029, 95% CI: 0.013–0.044, p < 0.001) and Severely Deteriorating HLST (B = 0.026, 95% CI: 0.005–0.047, p = 0.016) were significantly associated with higher FI, with Mildly Deteriorating HLST also reaching borderline significance (B = 0.018, p = 0.050).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
Multivariate analysis assigned a significant predictive value of homosexual transmission to infection with a subtype B virus (p < 0.001), Caucasian origin (p = 0.002), past or present syphilis infection (p < 0.001), being part of a transmission cluster (p = 0.004), past or present HBV (p = 0.012), and, with borderline significance, infection with a drug resistant virus (p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).
borderline significanceP = 0.051.0× alpha
While the meta-analysis did not confirm an effect on DGF after living donor KT, the subgroup analysis indicated a reduced incidence of DGF in recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants with dexmedetomidine, with borderline significance (RR: 0.52 [0.26–1.01]; P = 0.05; Fig. 1 A).
borderline significancep = 0.051.0× alpha
These survival differences were supported by unadjusted Cox regression analyses, which showed significantly higher hazard of graft failure among DCD recipients at 90 days (HR 2.50; 95% CI 1.23–5.16; p = 0.012) and borderline significance at 3 years (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.00–3.36; p = 0.05).