Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

The results of the meta-analysis were consistent with these findings, with an overall trend toward greater SAF in smokers than in non-smokers for similar age groups, but the difference did not reach statistical significance ( Supplementary Table S7 , Figure S9 ).
Survival analysis showed a trend toward improved overall survival in KRAS -wt EO-PDAC patients, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (52 versus 26 months, HR 2.27, 95% CI 0.78-6.66, P = 0.13) ( Supplementary Figure S3 , available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esmogo.2025.100179 ).
did not reach statistical significancep > 0.051.0× alphaplainly factual
Although no significant differences were observed in the expression of other genes, the expression levels of gastrointestinal growth-related genes in the 14 d group showed an increasing trend compared to both the 7 d and 21 d groups, but these differences did not reach statistical significance ( p > 0.05).
In the present study, inclusion of a single lap belt PT in addition to the shoulder belt PT showed a trend of reducing submarining risk for the reclined FE-HBMs, although this effect did not reach statistical significance for the simulation sample (p = 0.22).
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.3306.6× alphaplainly factual
The difference between obese and non-obese patients in the higher SML group showed a clear trend but did not reach statistical significance(median CSS: 605.0 days vs. 1196.0 days, P = 0.330, Fig. 4 b).
In the overall analysis, 0 % anti-inflammatory intake showed a trend of reduced AD-specific mortality although its did not reach statistical significance after full adjustment (HR 3.04, 95 % CI 0.74–12.46 vs. ≥10 % intake; p>0.05).
Compared with the OPS group, the MIS group showed a trend towards lower overall complication rates, but this did not reach statistical significance (OR=0.78, 95% CI [0.59–1.03], P =0.08), neither for PD (OR=1.10, 95% CI [0.43–2.79], P =0.84) nor for DP (OR=0.73, 95% CI [0.53–1.01], P =0.06).
While the GMV of the left thalamus in patients with dystonia (mean ± SD: 7092.346 ± 816.061) showed a trend towards reduction compared with that in healthy controls (mean ± SD: 7224.300 ± 927.542) ( P uncorrected = 0.011), it did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons.