Barely Significant
← all phrases

did not reach statistical significance

75,869 sentences · 75,869 papers · 119,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

In this study, patients who received radiotherapy during systemic treatment showed a trend toward improved iPFS compared with those who underwent radiotherapy prior to starting this regimen (P = 0.058), although this did not reach statistical significance due to the retrospective design and limited sample size( supplement Figure2 ).
Carer psychological distress showed a positive trend in its association with increasing PLWD unmanaged symptoms (coefficient = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.00, 0.13], p = 0.059) and agitation (coefficient = 0.06, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.14], p = 0.090), but both analyses did not reach statistical significance.
The root extracts showed a trend toward increasing CASP9 expression ( p = 0.059), but this did not reach statistical significance, meaning that while there might be a potential effect, the data do not provide strong enough evidence to confirm a reliable upregulation at the tested doses.
borderline significancep = 0.0591.2× alpha
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.3787.6× alphaplainly factual
However, the difference in AST and ALP did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.378 for AST, p = 0.190 for ALP), while GGT showed borderline significance ( p = 0.059). 3.4 WQS regression The eight components that make up the LE8 score were evaluated for their impact on these liver function parameters ( Figures 3A – E ).
Although post hoc comparisons did not reach statistical significance after Bonferroni correction, a clear trend toward higher TAN counts was observed in the c-erbB2-positive group compared with the c-erbB2-negative group (mean rank = 36.65 vs. 28.91, p = 0.059) ( Table 4 , Chart 4 ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.061.2× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
Assessment of hepatic triglyceride levels confirmed that HFD-fed mice had significantly higher liver triglycerides compared to Chow-fed mice ( Fig 4B ) (p < 0.01) but HCD-fed mice only showed a trend towards higher liver triglyceride content, which did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.06).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.061.2× alphaplainly factual
showed a trendp = 0.061.2× alpha
The overall pooled estimate across both time points showed a trend toward improvement that did not reach statistical significance (mean difference: 21.27, 95% CI: −0.96 to 43.50, p = 0.06), with substantial heterogeneity observed ( I 2 = 80%, p = 0.03).
However, in the validation set, the dual-phase model showed a trend toward higher AUC than the NP model for LR (ΔAUC =0.211, P=0.06) and SVM (ΔAUC =0.159, P=0.10), although these differences did not reach statistical significance.
However, these changes did not reach statistical significance, although they approached significance ( p = 0.06–0.08), likely due to the limited sample size ( N = 34 of the 60 children enrolled), as 26 participants had missing paired pre- and post-supplementation values and therefore could not be included in the comparative analysis.