Barely Significant
← all phrases

highly significant

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 156,979 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A linear statistical model for the rate constant of photoinhibition ( k PI ) was highly significant ( F (8,95) = 50.3, P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ) and showed that k PI was significantly affected by light color (coefficient 0.70 ± 0.0095, P = 6.75 × 10 −11 ) and leaf group (coefficient 0.016 ± 0.0069, P = 0.0256) but not by the other variables (see Summary of statistics available as Supplementary data at Tree Physiology Online).
highly significantP < 2.2 × 10 −160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The overlap between EgrNAC26-OX and EgrNAC61-OX datasets was highly significant ( P < 2.2 × 10 −16 ), only one transcript was alternately up- or down-regulated across time points, and DEGs common to EgrNAC26-OX and EgrNAC61-OX datasets were all up- or down-regulated concordantly, demonstrating robust and consistent activation of a subset of shared genes.
highly significantP < 2.2x10 -160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
DNA methylation at 84.7% of these sites was significantly associated with at least one common genetic variant using a stringent mQTL threshold (P < 1x10 -8 ) ( S2 Table ); this represented a highly significant enrichment for mQTL effects (P < 2.2x10 -16 ) compared to less-heritable DNA methylation sites (defined as those with A < 0.8), amongst which only 24.5% were associated with a mQTL variant.
highly significantp < 2.2E-160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Results Phenotypic variance decomposition and heritability of partial resistance to bacterial canker Considering differences between all controls and inoculated shoots regardless of the genotype effect, a highly significant effect of bacterial inoculation was observed (Wilcoxon unilateral t.test p < 2.2E-16) for lgc whatever the year and for bs in 2013 and 2015 (lesser extent in 2014 p < 9.77E-12 and 2016 p < 9.06E-06).
highly significantp < 2.2 × 10 –160.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A one-way ANOVA confirmed that the differences among residue classes are highly significant ( F (3, 14,983) = 682.6, p < 2.2 × 10 –16 ), supporting the hypothesis that CDR loops correspond to weakly coupled, energetically uncoupled regions when compared to the structural core of nanobodies.