“highly significant”

A distinct pattern of change was observed, with (highly significant: p < .001) improvements for the Pyramid group (on the three subscales), with large effect sizes for emotional symptoms ( d = 0.79) and peer relationship problems ( d = 0.82); comparison pupils showed minimal change.

However, as the thickness of the zirconia disc increased as in G1, G2 and G3 subgroups, the difference between measurements of resin groups increased and it was found to be highly significant (p<0.001).

All correlations appear to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) but with differences in the explainable variance.

As expected, sciatic and tibial nerve CSA was markedly increased in CMT1A patients, much greater than in IBM patients and controls with all comparisons highly significant ( p < 0.001).

This showed that there were highly significant differences between the community and the ASD group ( U = 1650.0, Z = −7.73, P < 0.001) as well as between the community and the clinical groups ( U = 4905.0, Z = −7.77, P < 0.001).

Overall, the model was highly significant and explanatory of TTHM concentrations ( F 3,92 = 135.3, p <0.001 , R 2 = 0.82).

Moreover, the multiple regression analysis in Table 3 shows a highly significant positive association of only duration of T2D with DR (p < 0.001) while no association between DR and HTN, currently smoking, uncontrolled T2D, age, and total cholesterol was noticed in contrary to the findings in the univariate regression.

However, in the case of Cairns, this pattern of results was highly significant ( χ 2 ( N = 1,099, df = 1) = 12.08, p < .001, Phi = .11).

- exhibited a highly significant negative correlation with total sugar content ( P ≤ 0.001).

Nine genes from this training set were found to have an increased burden of novel damaging mutations in our ‘restricted-eating’ and ‘binge-eating’ groups representing a highly significant, more than four-fold enrichment for known ED genes (OR = 4.2, P< 0.001).

Twenty four hour hypoxia treatment of 24 and 48 hpf embryos resulted in 3.4∼5.5 fold, highly significant increases (p<0.001) in IGFBP-1a mRNA levels and modest but statistically significant increases in IGFBP-1b mRNA levels (2.1 and 2.6 fold increases, p<0.01∼0.05).

At post-treatment week 48, there was a highly significant difference in walking and evening VAS scores; FFI total scores and FP, FF and PA sub-parameters of FHSQ in favour of the CFO group (P<0.001).

Experiment 2 Effects of the Time Setting on the Resemblance to a Smiling Face A one-way repeated measures ANOVA with TIME (10:10/11:30/8:20) as within-subject factor and RESEMBLANCE TO A SMILING FACE as dependent variable revealed a highly significant main effect for TIME ( F 2,22 = 155.249, P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.876).

Importantly, the onset of monocyte priming coincided with an increase in total plasma cholesterol levels (compare Figures 2 C and 1 A), and there was a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001) between plasma cholesterol levels and monocyte chemotaxis (Figure 2 D).

Carbonate Chemistry Observations showed that DIC ( Figure 2A ) and A T ( Figure 2B ) were consistently higher in the muddy sediment compared to the sandy sediment across all treatments, and sediment was highly significant for both A T ( p < 0.001) and DIC ( p < 0.001).

In patients with an abnormal and large %CO reduction (<−15%), the relation was highly significant: %CBF reduction = 0.8291 × %CO reduction − 5.789; R 2 = 0.645; p < 0.001.

leontopetaloides -derived compounds, the novel compound Tarkalynin A ( 1 ) displayed the most promising activity, but again with a highly significant separation between the Trypanozoon and Nannomonas subgenera ( p < 0.001), as EC 50 values against the former ranged between 21.4 μM ( T. equiperdum ) and 46.0 μM for T. evansi , whereas the compound was almost inactive against T. congolense (EC 50 = 246 μM).

We observed a highly significant difference between the distributions of body color phenotypes among caterpillars raised on intact willow vs. intact birch ( Table 1, G = 745, P<0.001 ).

A highly significant difference, with a strong effect size ( p < 0.001; d = −1.125) was found in the ALR‐RSI between the subgroup of 15 patients who returned to sport, regardless of the level of play and the 39 who did not: 60.3 (±13.8%) versus 40.3 (±21%), respectively.

Maize yield ANOVA results for maize grain yield indicated highly significant (P < 0.001) effects for location and year, as well as a location by year and year by irrigation interaction ( Table 3 ).

Exposure of GT 1 -7 cells to H3 resulted in an increase in GnRH release at 1 h that became highly significant at a concentration of 1,000 nM H3 [100 ± 10.1 basal vs. 247.2 ± 8.3 (1,000 nM H3), data shown as %basal, P < 0.001 vs. serum-free medium] ( Fig. 6 ).

With a highly significant F value of 1,009.134 and P value <0.001 for the 5 μM concentration, the mean percentage viability of H1299 cells ( Table 7 ) decreases from 72.25% (±2.39) at 5 μM to 48.84% (±1.17) at 30 μM and 27.63% (±0.59) at 50 μM EGCG, confirming the repeatability of this dose-dependent response.

For the mean drop angle, there was a highly significant difference between brands (F(2,12) = 192.40, p < 0.001), with a large effect size (η 2 p = 0.97).

This yielded a modest, but highly significant switch effect, F (1,19) = 40.7, p < 0.001, but no effect of task, F (1,19) = 0.03, p = 0.86, and only a marginal task × switch interaction, F (1,19) = 3.33, p = 0.08.

The Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.77 and the Bartlett’s test of sphericity was found to be highly significant (χ 2 = 10048.28, P < 0.001, df = 153).