“highly significant”

Logistic regression analysis showed that green tea consumption reduced the risk of aMCI in male participants (OR=0.657, P =0.019), and this finding was highly significant in males aged under 70 years (OR=0.376, P =0.002).

In contrast, after removing the weight change attributable to litter size, there remained a highly significant increase in weight of HET pups produced from Eed del/del growing oocytes compared to HET pups produced from Eed wt/del oocytes ( t 34.8 = 3.44, P = 0.002) and WT pups produced from either Eed wt/del ( t 36.3 = 2.81, P = 0.008) or Eed wt/wt ( t 33.1 = 2.29, P = 0.03) growing oocytes (Fig. 3e ).

Prehistoric fish were always bigger than contemporary Atlantic salmon and brown trout ( figure 1 a ), with highly significant differences for 1-, 2- and 3-year-old fish despite the limited archaeological sample size ( t -tests>3.5, p <0.002 in all cases).

Some values were highly significant ( P < 0.002, after Bonferroni correction), showing the existence of genetic differentiation among the samples analyzed (Table 5 ).

fat percentage) ( P = 0.00001) and no effect when the outcome was BMI; the difference in results was highly significant ( P = 0.002).

The subsequent increase in TSNR after application of RETROICOR translated to an improvement in BOLD sensitivity, demonstrated by the highly significant difference ( P = 0.002) between resting-state and vasoactive scans, illustrated in figure 4 (column 3).

A PERMANOVA to test for overall differences among the groups yielded highly significant results ( p = 0.002).

Notably, 2 GOs of 111 gene sets, regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway and regulation of inflammatory response, were found to include 5 of those 14 genes and showed highly significant associations ( P = 0.002, Fig. 5 ).

Three AUC main effects (CHO type, coffee roast, and timing) and two interactions (timing × roast; timing × CHO × roast) were highly significant ( p < 0.002).

In fact, the rating differences for NH children's happy and sad utterances were highly significant, t (14) = −3.81, p = 0.002, and the same trend was evident for child CI, t (14) = −1.96, p = 0.07.

The predictor Threat (β = 0.278, p = 0.149) and familiarity (β = -0.287, p = 0.114) were not significant, however, the interaction term threat × familiarity was highly significant (β = -0.613, p = 0.002).

In contrast, thiazolidinedione use showed a highly significant association with glycemic control (χ2 = 9.918, p = 0.002), suggesting a potentially meaningful impact of this drug class on outcomes.

Such differences in the proportions of both clusters A and B between 2004-SD and 2004-PD wasps were indeed highly significant (P = 0.002), which may partly explain why the highest pairwise Fst values were obtained between 2004-PD and the other groups ( Table 4 ).

Table 2 shows a highly significant correlation between a family history of oral cancer and awareness of risk factors for oral cancer ( P = 0.002), with 95% of respondents with a family history of oral cancer having knowledge of risk factors for mouth cancer in the highest category.

The strong effect of the three main risk factors as determined on univariate analysis were contacted with wildlife being highly significant (p=0.002), movement to the plains was also highly significant (p=0.001) and sharing of drinking water (p=0.017) all of which can be summarized as the strong effect of mixing between wildlife and domestic animals.

The two interactions were indeed highly significant in both LTMs (alpha: χ 2 (4) = 17.30, P = 0.002; theta: χ 2 (4) = 17.71, P = 0.001) and CTLs (alpha: χ 2 (4) = 22.04, P < 0.001; theta: χ 2 (4) = 18.76, P < 0.001).

In the Kaplan Meier survival analysis, the Logrank test was highly significant between group 1 and group 3 ( p = 0.002) and significant between group 2 and group 3 ( p = 0.038), but not significant between group 1 and group 2.

However, a highly significant positive correlation of mean methylation with the baseline excited factor score (r=0.342, p=0.002), but with no other PANSS subscore, was found.

>30 weeks post-infection from these 8 RM were highly significant (p = 0.002 for all samples, p = 0.0006 for BM by two-sided Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests).

Although the number of cells did not decrease to the levels found in control non-sensitized animals, the decrease was dose proportional and highly significant (p < 0.002) when compared to OVA-sensitized mice which did not receive ASM-024.

[ 22 ] Residence area had a highly significant positive relationship with participants’ perceptions and experiences of telemedicine ( P = 0. 002).

Results HT patients group had highly significant greater cIMT as compared to NT patients (p=0.002) and this correlated with an increase in the expression of LRP1 mRNA expression (6.54 vs. 2.87) (p = 0.002) and LRP1 protein expression (17.83 vs. 6.25), respectively (p = 0.001).

In the 53 observations where the IgG Index is ≤ 1.14, there is a highly significant positive correlation between number of OCBs and the IgG Index ( r = 0.39, slope = 11.45, se = 3.74, p = 0.002); however, in the 16 observations where the IgG Index is greater than 1.14 but less than 1.9, the slope decreases, but not significantly so ( r = -0.14, slope = -6.09, se = 11.68, p = 0.68) ( Fig 2C ).

Total CSF and secondary CSF glycosylation demonstrated highly significant associations with decreased levels of t‐tau (p < 0.002; p < 0.02 respectively) and p‐Tau181 (p< 0.006; p<0.02 respectively) over a 10‐year period.

Moderately differentiated and PD tumours themselves form weaker clusters ( P =0.05 and P =0.06, respectively), however when combined they show a highly significant clustering pattern ( P =0.002).