Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.00280.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Detailed analysis of the palmitoylomics results revealed that knockdown of ZDHHC21 provoked a strong (approximately four-fold change plotted in log 2 scale, which correspond to approximately 15 times decrease in the palmitoylation level) and highly significant ( P = 0.0028) decrease of 5-HT1AR palmitoylation in comparison to the scr samples (Fig. 5h ).
highly significantP = 0·00280.1× alphaqualifiedgold
A stratified analysis by ethnicity revealed striking differences between Fulani and non-Fulani, with a very high and highly significant heritability estimate in the 135 Fulani (h 2 =0·71, P = 0·0028, likelihood ratio test) and a near zero and nonsignificant one in the 285 non-Fulani (h 2 =0·01, P = 0·49, likelihood ratio test) ( Figure 4 a).
highly significantp = 0.002800.1× alphaqualifiedgold
For our peak-performing configuration, the acoustic + wav2vec 2.0 + WavLM fusion model post-exercise, we obtained highly significant empirical p -values of p = 0.00280 for the vowel phonation task and p = 0.00300 for the voluntary cough task, indicating that these results are statistically robust.
highly significantp = 0.00290.1× alphaqualifiedgold
The results for the second variant under investigation (rs1470579) demonstrated that the CC genotype was more frequent in the patients' group (9.4%) than the control group (4.3%), with the statistical analysis displaying a highly significant difference ( p = 0.0029) between the frequencies of the C allele in the patients' group (25.3%) and control group (16.8%), as reported in Table 6 and Figure 5 .
highly significantp < 0.00290.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival showed highly significant differences in patients with remission (R), and no change (NC) or progression (P) at time of staging investigations after the third therapy cycle (p < 0.0029 between R and NC; p < 0.0001 between R and P; Figure 1A ) with median survival times of 528 (R), 328 (NC), and 327 (P) days, respectively.
highly significantp = 0.00290.1× alphaqualifiedgold
Unexpectedly, while there were no significant interactions between genotype and sex after correcting for multiple comparisons, there were highly significant effects of sex on these DTI metrics in each region where FA (Supplementary Fig. 4A ; LM, p = 0.0029, p = 5.25 × 10 −5 , p = 7.71 × 10 −4 ), MD (Supplementary Fig. 4B ; Tukey HSD, p adj . 2.83 × 10 −10 ), and RD parameters (Supplementary Fig. 4C ; LM, p = 4.04 × 10 −9 and Tukey HSD, p adj . < 1.0 × 10 −20 ) were all higher in the males.
highly significantP = 0.00290.1× alphaqualifiedgold
We speculate that while our model shows a highly significant distinction between patients with a high or low risk of developing recurrence ( P = 0.0029, Fig. 3B ), the sensitivity and NPV of our and similar methods will not be sufficient to ethically withhold adjuvant therapy in the clinical application of a postoperative MRD‐test in stage II–III NSCLC.