“highly significant”

A highly significant difference (Figure 9a ) was measured between postprandial blood sugar levels after consuming both control and intervention recipes ( p = .000).

The Welch’s ANOVA test applied on data with unequal variances (Levene’s test at α = 0.05) shows highly significant differences (F = 24.99; α = 0.001; p = 0.000) between the mean values of tested groups for data sets collected in the 5–7 July period, as well as significant differences but not highly significant (F = 9.81; α = 0.001; p = 0.002) between the tested groups for data sets collected in the 16–18 August period.

They demonstrate, for AKT, mTOR, TSC2, S6K, and FOXO3 expression values, highly significant regression curves (ANOVA p < 0.000) with FMR1 expression, with the linear model being the best fitting one compared to other models.

The reduction in recession in both groups were statistically highly significant ( P = 0.000).

**, highly significant ( P < 0.0l).

We found that the association between presenting symptoms and difficulty in performing ADL was highly significant (χ 2 = 38.8, P = 0.000).

3.2 RTs analysis The 1 × 3 repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) performed on the individual median RTs using language condition (LAHF, LALF and SAHF) words showed a highly significant effect of language condition ( F [2, 36] = 41.38, p = .000, η p 2 = .697).

The ROC derived from the prediction model yielded an area under the curve of 0.70, slightly higher than the ROC of the 10th percentile cut-off. Discussion The association between blink rate and DIP and UPDRS score in patients with SMI is highly significant ( p < 0.000).

Our result was highly significant ( P = 0.0), leading us to reject the null hypothesis and indicating that the genomes of these four strains display signatures of recombination.

The difference was highly significant ( P = 0).

At all-time points (days 1–7, 14, and 21), the difference in fluoride release between F3 and F4 remained highly significant ( p = 0.000).

Concerning the highly significant association between age and PRA (p = 0.000), we performed a simple regression analysis on these two variables.

Trust in Vendor The hypothesis that IUES is significantly affected by trust in vendor-related hypotheses (F2 > 0.383) and is highly significant ( p < 0.000) is supported by the data.

Also, the risk increased to twice among children consuming junk food more than once a day (OR: 2; 95% CI = 1.30–3.08).[ 45 ] Among participants belonging to the overweight and obese category, 12% of the total were found to prefer fast food and results were found to be highly significant at X2 = 45.23 with P < 0.000, whereas 13.33% were reported as binge eaters (X2 = 68.63 with P < 0.000; highly significant).[ 46 ] Family history of obesity Findings from a study to document the prevalence of overweight and obesity among school children of an affluent school suggested a higher incid

As expected, highly significant downregulation of RECK mRNA in cancer tissues was observed ( P = 0.000; Fig. 2A ).

A highly significant, positive correlation was observed between poor sleep quality and fatigue levels (r = 0. 426, at p = 0.000) .

More males (65.3%) agreed or strongly agreed with the statement ‘Work as a neurosurgery specialist can impede family life as compared to females (57.5%), which was highly significant ( p = 0.000).

Applicants from the African Region had the highest risk of being diagnosed with TB (old or active) compared with applicants from other regions and this difference was statistically highly significant (OR = 21.25; 95% CI: 6.72–67.17, P < 0.000).

A highly significant relationship ( r 2 = 0.16, p < 0.000) was found between Sørensen dissimilarity in soil cores and distance apart.

( 29 ) altered the result from non-significant ( P = 0.34) to highly significant ( P = 0.000). 3.10 Quality assessment The quality of evidence for the incidence of PONV was rated as high.

Again, this constituted under-representation, which in this instance was highly significant ( p = 0).

Number of children had a highly significant positive relationship with age of patient (r = 0.239, p = 0.000).

This cleavage event was strongly supported by 16,415.36 reads, ranked as the global maximum (Category 0) with highly significant confidence ( p = 0.00).

Highly significant positive correlations ( p = 0.000) between either the depressive or the manic components of the MOODS-SR and the ASA-27 total scores were also found within the group of healthy control subjects.

One-way ANOVA test showed a highly significant difference between groups ( p <0.000) and there were no significant differences in FS between the Cons vs Trad access cavity designs in class I and class II cavities, respectively.