“highly significant”

From Table 3 , the relationship between thriving at work and innovative work behavior is highly significant ( β = 0.3543 , p < 0.000 ) supporting H 1 .

Plotting the Log2 fold change of the list of genes changes following HCV infection (presented in Fig 1 ) against the Log2 fold change of the list of genes changes in DAAs-treated cured cells show a highly significant correlation in mRNA levels (Spearman rank, cor = 0.91 p = 0) ( Fig 2C ).

Table 2 revealed that the model is highly significant (F=9.023, P-value=0.000**).

Results After one year of Homeopathic treatment, reduction in serum IgE level (1006.83±395.17 versus 336.5±126.96), absolute eosinophil count (600.33±103.61 versus 302.5±82.21) and symptom score (30.27±5.12 versus 12.83±2.72) were statistically highly significant (paired t test; t 29 = 10.84, 18.17 & 22.37 respectively; P = 0.0000) with 95% confidence level.

These differences were statistically highly significant ( p = 0.000; rho = 0.549).

The dispersion test was highly significant ( p = 0), indicating slight under-dispersion, an expected by-product of the negative-binomial plus random-intercept structure that, however, makes standard errors conservative rather, thus avoiding the risk of false positive associations.

In women, VO 2 /kg demonstrated a highly significant increase after an 8-week training period on PowerBreathe ( p < 0.000) and remained at the same level after the end of training for a further 6 weeks (Test 3).

There are also highly significant interactions between the species and the chemical compound (F 1, 133 = 26.3, p < 0), species and storage (F 1, 133 = 19.2, p < 0), compound and storage (F 1, 133 = 52.4, p < 0) and between species and plant part (F 1, 133 = 2.9, p < 0.05).

In the experimental group, there was a highly significant difference in total caries experience (deft + DMFT) (p = 0.000), with a reduction in the mean number of decayed teeth (dt + DT) and missing teeth (et + MT) scores, along with an increase in filled teeth (ft + FT) scores after 12 months.

Our analyses revealed (see Table 1 ) that 1 month after treatment there was a highly significant ( p < 0.000) reduction of problems associated with or resulting from nasal obstruction (NOSE) as well as of snoring and problems due to snoring/poor sleep (SOS).

The data showed highly significant improvement in GERD symptoms (P=0.000) after four weeks of the intervention when measured by Visual Analog Scales and 69 to 89% improvement in symptoms (Heart burn, reflux, nausea, vomiting and dyspepsia) when estimated by Yes/No response. 11 Akram’s life-style, i.e., two regular meals a day and consumption of only liquids in between, avoids hyperacidity induced by meal on top of meal, allows MMC of inter-digestive phase to work smoothly and prevents delay in gastric emptying.

Results: A statistically highly significant increase in total duration of analgesia (in minutes) was recorded in Group RD as compared to Group R (469.6 ± 81.5 in Group RD and 298.2 ± 42.3 in Group R) ( P = 0.000).

The statistical methods assumed a significance level of p < 0.05 and a highly significant level of p < 0.00.

Here again the differences were highly significant (χ 2 531.4, p<0.0000).

A two sample t-test reveals this difference in slopes to be highly significant (t-statistic =17.4, p -value ≈0).

Regarding the comparison between control and lavender oil massage groups, there were highly significant differences between the two groups, with p = 0.00.

The correlation analysis of bone fraction (osteocalcin) and BV/TV (InVesalius + ImageJ) was highly significant ( p = 0.0000), with a moderate effect strength (rho = 0.4942) ( Figure 2 a).

Family history of cancer was also found as highly significant ( p <0.000, Odds ratio 16.45, 95 % CI 7.49-36.16) risk factor for GBC.

The quadratic models constructed for both response variables were statistically highly significant ( p = 0.000).

The mean placental diameter was 17.9 ± 1.9 cm (range 15–25) in Group B, whereas it was 21.7 ± 2.3 cm (range 14–26) in Group A, and the difference between both groups was highly significant ( P < 0.000) [ Table 2 ].

However, when the viral load was <100 copies/reaction, McNemar test indicated a highly significant difference ( P = 0.000) between the qualitative detection results of the two methods, indicating an inconsistency in the detection of low-concentration samples.

Differences in RNFL and GCC parameters between normal and glaucomatous eyes, OHT, and POAG were highly significant ( P = 0.00, P < 0.001).

very highly significant (p<0.000).

A highly significant positive correlation was found between device size and defect size measured by TTE, TEE, and balloon sizing (r=0.918–0.951; p=0.000) ( Table 2 ).

The omnibus test of model coefficients was highly significant ( P = 0.000) indicating that the regression model was statistically significant.