“highly significant”

Effect of Trap Placement Distance on the Palm Tree The analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the variable captures per day transformed, log(x + 1), indicates that the treatment factor has a highly significant effect on daily captures (F(2, 12) = 55.68, p < 0.0001).

The difference between HR on admission, 12 h and 24 hours was highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Post hoc pairwise t tests using CAR-T monotherapy as the reference revealed no significant difference for CAR-T + aPD-L1, a statistically significant reduction for CAR-T + TGF-βi ( p < 0.05), and a highly significant effect for the CAR-T + dual TGF-βi/aPD-L1 ( p < 0.0001).

The Egger’s test result was highly significant (t = 6.60, p < 0.0001), indicating potential asymmetry and suggesting the likelihood of publication bias ( Supplementary File S26 ). - Similarly, in the OS multivariate analysis, the funnel plot showed some studies lying outside the triangular area, consistent with significant heterogeneity.

The difference in mean value of FBG showed a highly significant decrease ( P < 0.0001) from baseline to end of treatment, i.e., from 167.0, (59.16) 172.6 (58.51) and 171.0 (39.47) to 140.2, (26.46) 143.8 (22.04) and 138.5 (27.82) mg/dL.

The differences between the diabetes groups and the control group were highly significant with P < 0.0001.

It was found that the difference between the arithmetic means was statistically highly significant ( p ≤ 0.0001) Table 1 .

Following gentamicin intervention, Caspase-3 fluorescence signals significantly increased, with mean fluorescence intensity showing a highly significant difference compared to the control group ( p < 0.0001), demonstrating that gentamicin effectively induces vestibular hair cell apoptosis.

MYOCD x CSPG4 correlations were highly significant across the brain regions examined in this analysis (P < 0.0001 throughout).

Analysis of cancer genome datasets (TCGA and GTEx) revealed greater NLRP3 and IL-1β expression in cutaneous melanoma samples ( n = 469) compared to normal skin ( n = 324), with a highly significant correlation between NLRP3 and IL-1β ( P < 0.0001).

Correlation analysis There were highly significant negative correlations between anxiety and depression scores and LAC ReHo values in the DON group ( r = -0.9336, P < 0.0001 and r = -0.8453, P < 0.0001, respectively; Figure 5 ).

The values of Shannon and Simpson’s diversity indices were 1.116 and 0.602 for Greenlon’s sample respectively versus 0.613 and 0.335 in the presents sample (Table 2 ), a difference that was highly significant in both cases ( p < 0.0001).

Similarly, arterial oxygen pressure saw a more pronounced increase in the observation group (13.18 ± 1.92 mm Hg) compared to the control group (9.92 ± 1.02 mm Hg), with a highly significant difference ( P < .0001) (Fig. 1 B).

The amount of MON deposition under infinite-dose conditions was examined from three formulations: MON-NLC, MON-NLC gel, and MON in water across the epidermis, dermis, and the receiver chamber of the Franz diffusion cell after 24 h application ( Figure 11 ). A significant finding was that the MON-loaded NLC gel left much less MON on the skin surface (59.50 ± 505.81 ng/cm2) as extracted from the skin wash compared to the MON-loaded NLC (14313.11 ± 118.88 ng/cm2), with a highly significant p-value of <0.0001.

When comparing the medians (interquartile ranges) of the 2 GA-T trials performed by the participants, no significant difference was noted, although the time to complete the second trial was shorter [365 (260-545) s vs 360 (250-540) s, P=0.81]; highly significant intraobserver agreement (P<0.0001) was observed between the measurements of the 2 GA-T trials (ICC=0.97 and 95%CI: 0.96-0.99).

Statistical analysis Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) for physicochemical properties showed highly significant differences ( P < 0.0001) between the Dominico Harton, Guineo and Gros Michel varieties (Table 4 ).

Their distribution by generation is shown in Table 1 . The increased ratio after 1950 is highly significant statistically ( p < .0001).

Simple linear regression analyses in circulating CD4 + T cells revealed a strong and highly significant positive correlation between p‐S6 and γH2AX levels in both treatment groups ( R 2 = 0.5481 [placebo], 0.7758 [rapamycin], p < 0.0001 in both groups), indicating that mTOR activity and DNA damage are positively linked in vivo (Figure 6b,c ).

The association between the inner brow raiser and eye movements was highly significant (χ 2 MH = 1322.1, df = 1, P < 0.0001; N = 21).

Additionally, a Mantel test between DAPC genetic differentiation among populations and their corresponding geographic distances was highly significant ( P -value < 0.0001) and had a positive Mantel statistic ( r = 0.36) ( Table 5 ; see Supporting Information—Fig.

Furthermore, the median survival time (TTH) of Surgicel was lower than that of Arista, PerClot, and 4DryField, and the log-rank test showed that the difference in time to achieve hemostasis between Surgicel and each of the test articles was also highly significant ( P < .0001; Supplementary Table S3 ).

There was a highly significant relationship between average PDSS and age (slope = 0.118 PDSS/month; 95 % CI: [0.096, 0.141], p < 0001); which remained true for both females (slope = 0.212 PDSS/year; 95 % CI: [0.181, 0.244], p < 0.001) and males (slope = 0.049; 95 % CI: [0.02, 0.078], p = 0.001), but the slope for rate in change in average PDSS/month was greater for females than for males (p < 0.001).

We also calculated the corrected p value for comparing Lmna KO and Lmna/Lap2α DKO, which is highly significant (Dunn's multiple comparisons test p < 0.0001 as part of Kruskal-Wallis post tests).

A highly significant positive correlation was observed between p-AKT and Rictor expression in feline carcinomas ( p = 0.0001).

Pooled left and right arm data were then compared between megachiropterans and microchiropterans and showed highly significant differences (T = - 8.77, P = 0.0001); and clear separation of measurements between the groups ( Fig 2C ).