Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Moreover, a statistically significant ( P < 0.004) interaction between the organ sampling-time and the SNP treatment was revealed in kidney regardless of the dosing time, whereas a highly significant ( P < 0.0002) interaction was validated in liver only in animals injected at 13 HALO. pmc-status-qastatus 0 pmc-status-live yes pmc-status-embargo no pmc-status-released yes pmc-prop-open-access yes pmc-prop-olf no pmc-prop-manuscript no pmc-prop-legally-suppressed no pmc-prop-has-pdf yes pmc-prop-has-supplement no pmc-prop-pdf-only no pmc-prop-suppress-copyright no pmc-prop-is-real-version no pmc-prop-is-scanned-article no pmc-prop-preprint no pmc-prop-in-epmc yes pmc-license-ref CC BY 1.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
This reduction was highly significant relative to that in CpG-A-treated cells from 10 healthy donors in 14 experiments ( p = 0.0002) and relative to control supernatants from Huh7.5 cells transfected with subgenomic replicon and rendered apoptotic by UV irradiation (p = 0.01).
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Given the fraction of total axis length that was asynapsed in these syp-1 RNAi mnT12 nuclei, the observed restriction of GFP::COSA-1 foci to synapsed segments (where homologs are closely juxtaposed) represents a highly significant (χ 2 test; p = 0.0002) departure from the distribution expected if GFP::COSA-1 foci were equally likely to occur on synapsed segments and asynapsed segments (where homologs are separated), consistent with the interpretation that these GFP::COSA-1 foci correspond to interhomolog recombination events. 6 Extended Data Figure 4.
highly significantp = 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the female subsample, the effects of DDSS and age were both highly significant (Q = 14.7; p = 0.0002, Q = 23.8; p < 0.0001, respectively), but the effect of DDSS on usability ratings was different for younger patients than it was for older participants (Q = 7.9; p = 0.005), suggesting that younger women (<52 years) showed greater usability rating differences between Ada and Rheport.
highly significantP < 0.00020.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The analysis showed that the level of TMEM244 expression is negatively correlated with the square of the methylation level in the promoter region ( R = −0.4766), and this correlation is highly significant ( P < 0.0002) (Figure 4 ). 4 DISCUSSION In this study, we showed that methylation is a key regulatory mechanism of TMEM244 expression.