Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP = 0.00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
2A to D ), and the highly significant ( P = 0.0008) reduction in bacterial resistance to some antibiotics from IIS to WWE ( Fig. 2B ), reinforces the need for adequate water treatment for all and preventing natural environmental surface waters having similar community profiles to untreated wastewater.
highly significantp = 0.00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Remarkably, this revealed that, despite the relatively low r 2 for each individual chemokine, a highly significant ( p = 0.0008), four-chemokine model including CCL17 (TARC), CCL11 (Eotaxin), CCL2 (MCP-1), and PDGF-BB could explain about 80% of the variation in the proportion of HMC/CD34 in our cohort of SCD and healthy individuals ( Figure 4 B).
highly significantp = 0.00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
However, gamma coherence showed highly significant increases during choice compared to must-touch between mPFC and vCA1 ( Figures 1 G and S3 B; mPFC-vCA1 t(3) = 13.760, p = 0.0008), similar to changes reported from T-maze DNMTS tasks. 18 , 19 In addition we found marginal increases in gamma coherence between nRE and vCA1 ( Figure 1 G; nRE-vCA1 t(2) = 3.272, p = 0.082).
highly significantp = 0.00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant difference was observed between the maximum stress value for the RC scaffolds versus XYP scaffolds when the deposition time was 45 min ( p = 0.0008, F = 81.55, and critical F = 7.71); however, no significant difference was observed for the elongation at break ( p = 0.24, F = 1.89, and critical F = 7.71).
highly significantp -value = 0.00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Wilcoxon rank sum test revealed a highly significant shift towards trajectory-reliance from session 1 (median = 0.0076) to session 2 (median = 0.1973; w = 116, p -value = 0.0008, r = 0.5128), from session 1 (median = 0.0076) to session 3 (median = 0.2757; w = 46, p -value < 10 −5 , r = 0.6781), from session 1 (median = 0.0076) to session 6 (median = 1.0241; w = 2, p -value < 10 −8 , r = 0.7385), from session 2 (median = 0.1973) to session 6 (median = 1.0241; w = 16, p -value = 0.0001, r = 0.6953) and from session 3 (median = 0.2757) to session 6 (median = 1.0241; w = 20, p -value = 0.0014, r = 0.6534).
highly significantp-value=0·00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In contrast to the analysis of the first event in the extended follow-up, the number of previous self-harm episodes was highly significant with an increased rate of recurrent self-harm in those with three or more self-harm episodes at baseline (HR 2·05, 95% CI: 1·35, 3·12, p-value=0·0008) and there was a higher rate of self-harm in those referred via hospital (HR 1·64, 95% CI 1·04, 2·61, p -value=0·0348). 3.6.
highly significantp = 0.00080.0× alphaqualifiedgold
While rs2555639 was the only SNP that was significantly associated with risk of colon cancer in each of the discovery and validation sets independently, several additional SNPs had highly significant association with risk when combining data from the discovery and validation samples ( Table 5 ), including rs1365611 (OR = 1.73, 95%CI:1.26–2.37, p = 0.0008), rs6844282 (OR = 1.42, 95%CI:1.10–1.83, p = 0.0078), and rs2332897 (OR = 1.74, 95%CI:1.27–2.38, p = 0.0006).