“marginal significance”

The anteroposterior stability index decreased after the insole intervention, with marginal significance and a large ES ( P = .050, ES = 0.51).

In addition, outcomes related to gait balance and symmetry displayed marginal significance, with subgroup z -values of 2.00 ( P = 0.05) for gait balance general, 1.94 ( P = 0.05) for gait balance timing, and CIs for the MD overlapping zero.

In addition, the MR analyses for CKD, eGFR, and BUN further provided causal evidence for INHBC and SNUPN, with marginal significance for LMAN2 ( P = 0.0503).

Compared with the control group, the most significant drug-related adverse event was diarrhea which reached marginal significance (4.4% in the Huaier group vs. 1.9% in the control group, P=0.0505).

In contrast, the genus Actinomyces, of which the frequency is equivalent to the genus Rothia, was found to decrease in oral cancer patients with metastasis with marginal significance ( P = 0.0506) ( Fig. 3B ).

In group B 3 (skin closure, 0.375% ropivacaine), the PLSP rate was 24.2% (8 of 33), showing marginal significance compared to B1 and B2 (adjusted P = 0.051).

However, for L2 listeners, the interaction between attention and linguistic structures reached marginal significance ( F (1.387,31.893) = 3.692, p = 0.051), showing that only at the phrase-level frequency of 2 Hz did L2 listeners take advantage of voluntary attention to enhance their neural responses compared with passive listening ( p = 0.029) but not at the other tagged frequencies.

Five minutes after exposure to sunlight, the 10k lux group exhibited a greater decrease in choroidal BFP change compared with the 4k lux group with marginal significance (10k lux: −0.4 vs 4k lux: 0.1, p=0.051).

These predictions are limited by the time range of the dataset, and caution is advised due to the marginal significance of the habitat and years interaction ( p = 0.051).

Water temperature was negatively related to biomass with marginal significance (R = −0.26, p = 0.051), whereas suspended solids, chlorophyll a, and phosphorus variables showed weak associations (all p > 0.05). 4.

Among these QTLs, seven QTLs on chromosomes 1, 3, 4, and 8 were detected repeatedly in three environments, and one QTL ( qPH8.1 ) revealed a significant effect ( p < 0.01) at E2 and E3, but marginal significance ( p = 0.051) at E3 ( Table 1 ).

However, subgroup analysis represented significant impact in only primary tumor groups (p=0.0190) and marginal significance in neoadjuvant-treated patients group (p=0.0510) ( S4 Fig. ). 6.

However, when paternal ADHD symptoms were controlled, the association diminished to marginal significance (p = 0.051; partial η2 = 0.051).

Furthermore, the change in NLR from 3 months to 6 months post-TIPS showed marginal significance (P = 0.051).

In addition, definite CAN was a significant risk factor for reduced eGFR (OR=6.2, 95% CI 1.4–27.53, p=0.016) and a possible risk factor for elevated uACR with marginal significance (OR=1.96, 95% CI 1.0–3.87, p=0.051).

However, when only severe and moderate ABP cases were considered, this factor showed marginal significance (OR: 5.462, 95%CI: 0.992-30.077, P = 0.051).

Further studies are needed to confirm the sex differences because of the marginal significance result in the interaction analysis ( p = 0.051 for interaction term BMI × sex; p = 0.056 for interaction term WHR × sex).

However, it is worth noting that in the dimension of introjected regulation, a marginal significance value was found ( p = 0.051), which may indicate a potential difference in a larger sample.

Furthermore, association with DSS was observed with a P -value near marginal significance ( P =0.051, Figure 2 B) with a median survival of 15.91 vs. 44.74 months in DPP3 high vs. low groups, respectively.

The correlation between explicit other-directed anti-fat bias (AFAT) and implicit anti-fat bias (IAT) decreased from r = 0.28 at baseline to r = 0.18, with only marginal significance at post-intervention, F (1, 188) = 3.87, p = 0.051.

Notably, the number of high-quality embryos also increased with the hormone level after the trigger, with marginal significance in patients with the GnRH-a trigger (P = 0.051) in this study.

Notably, the interaction with gender exhibits marginal significance (p = 0.051), implying that the impact of self-provisioning on agroecology transitioning may vary between genders.

These changes were statistically significant (p<0.05), except for the lateral width of the left kidney, which showed marginal significance (p=0.051).

In the subgroup analysis, the interaction term of diabetes showed marginal significance ( P = 0.051), indicating a potential modifying effect of diabetes on the link between CMI and OA.

The linkage of road traffic noise and obesity tends to be stronger among females ( P < 0.05) and in those who took less physical activity with marginal significance ( P = 0.051).