“marginal significance”

This effect was manifested by a shortening of the QT interval which reached marginal significance ( P = 0.0594) and a tendency toward QTc improvement ( P = 0.0921) compared with the control group at comparable heart rate ( Figure 4 ). 3.3.

We also noticed that LASr_Ac was positively correlated with peak mitral inflow velocity at atrial contraction with marginal significance (r = 0.41, p = 0.0598) in the Fontan group.

Adding ‘isotope’ (δ 13 C, δ 15 N, δ 34 S) as a categorical variable to the above model revealed marginal significance (p = 0.06), and no significant body mass-isotope interaction (p = 0.29).

An accompanying peak was observed at 22 Hz over C3 ( Fig 2 ) after termination ( M = 2.71 μV, SD = 1.35) over the last contraction second ( M = 2.01 μV, SD = 1.17) with marginal significance t (19) = 1.98, p = .06, d z = .44, which likely represents a harmonic component of the upper alpha enhancement [ 44 ].

Higher MTV and lower ADC min values were found in high-grade tumors, with marginal significance (p=0.06 and p=0.054, respectively).

Positive objective response showed only marginal significance on LPFS (p=0.06) and PFS (p=0.07). 5.

The interaction term between the genotype and age at first childbirth estimated by a case-only study [ 23 ] was 0.40 (95% CI 0.15-1.04), with marginal significance ( P = 0.06).

The association between K trans reproducibility and plaque size showed only marginal significance (ρ = −0.33, p = 0.06; Figure 2 e).

The only other characteristic to differ was BMI, which was 23.3 kg/m 2 in the RSPC group and 24.1 kg/m 2 in the ALC group, which had marginal significance (P = 0.060) ( Table 1 ).

Nevertheless, the second study only enrolled 29 GBM patients and the comparison performed by log-rank test showed marginal significance ( P = 0.06).

Post hoc comparisons revealed that normalized N100 amplitudes in the 1% and 5% formalin groups were significantly larger than those in the NS and NT groups for any post-injection session ( p < 0.05 for all comparisons except for the marginal significance ( p = 0.06) between 1% formalin and NS groups during the 20–50 min interval after injection).

Faculty ratings varied at a marginal significance level according to experimental group ( F = 2.89, p < 0.06).

For synonymous variants, more variants were found in Old T5 lines than in Young T1 and Peak T2 lines with marginal significance ( N = 8; X 2 = 6.25, p = .06).

In K–M curves (Supplementary Figure 6), this trend demonstrated marginal significance ( P = 0.06).

When the data were stratified by autoantibody positivity (RF, ACPA) ( online supplemental table S1–S2 ), high PM 10 exposure showed a numerical trend towards a positive association with RA-ILD mortality in the RF (+) (HR 1.54; 95% CI 0.98 to 2.42; p=0.060) and ACPA (+) (HR 1.58; 95% CI 0.99 to 2.51; p=0.054) groups; but with marginal significance.

In multiple linear regression analyses, femoral neck BMD had a significant positive association with eGFR ( P = 0.012), lumbar spine and proximal total femur BMD had a marginal significance ( P = 0.060 and P = 0.079, respectively), whereas, trochanteric BMD was not associated with eGFR ( P = 0.422) (data not shown).

In this breeding system, tests across all generations showed a significant correlation of viability with bkgLD ( P =0.02) and marginal significance with g2 ( P =0.06).

SWS synchrony among pairs containing one visTRN and one PC neuron reached marginal significance ( P = 0.06, Wilcoxon singed-rank test), compared to values obtained from other heterologous pairs, which were all non-significant (right side of Figure 1I ).

Hoarders who scored below the median anxiety score demonstrated significant impairments in TOL, set shifting, PRL, and marginal significance in SSRT ( p <0.06), replicating the results reported in Table 2 .

An LRP reversing agent, PAK-104P, was found to increase the daunorubicin content with marginal significance (P=0.060).

Among other factors with marginal significance CD4 T-cell count (β = −0.21, P = 0.06) and age (β = −0.20, P = 0.06) were noted ( Table 3 ).

When adjusted for the same covariates, CD was not associated with neurologic morbidities in the moderate to late (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.94–1.32) and very preterm (aHR 1.34, 95% CI 0.74–2.45) groups, while in extremely preterm, CD was found significant (aHR 4.06, 95% CI 1.18–13.9). Infectious morbidities The assessment of the first episode of infection in offspring, including disease subgroups (Table S2 ), showed a higher prevalence of infectious events in the CD group, with 1608 (69%) versus 1051 (62%) in the VD group (OR 1.39, 95%CI 1.22–1.59), although the marginal significance, this was also supported by the Kaplan–Meier survival curve (Fig. 2 c, Log-rank p = 0.06).

Separate univariate ANOVAs indicated one significant ROI pair, in favor of the FTB group, RFOI-RLOC: F (1,53) = 5.32, p < 0.05, η 2 = 0.09) and another ROI pair with marginal significance in favor of the FTB group, RIPS-RFOI: F (1,53) = 3.60, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.06).

No statistically significant survival benefit was observed from the comparison of the regimens containing platinum, taxane, or both to the chemotherapies with agents other than platinums or taxanes, except for the marginal significance of regimens containing both platinums and taxanes for a median survival time of 2.02 months ( P =0.06).

The IVR rate in patients without manipulation during URS was not different to those with manipulation ( P = 0.658), and higher than those without URS although there was a statistically marginal significance ( P = 0.060, Fig 3 ).