Idarubicin group had more CR rate than daunorubicin group with marginal significance ( P = 0.06, see Table 2 ). 4 NR patients after first course of induction didn’t undergo the second course of chemotherapy and were unevaluable if they are chemotherapy refractory or not. 2 of them died of serious infections post chemotherapy and other 2 of them was bridged to transplantation directly.
← all phrases
“marginal significance”
Sighted at
p=0.07
In the literature
In addition, students with one or both parents who were high school graduates were reclassified earlier than students whose parents were not high school graduates, reaching marginal significance ( p = 0.06).
Hoarders who scored below the median anxiety score demonstrated significant impairments in TOL, set shifting, PRL, and marginal significance in SSRT ( p <0.06), replicating the results reported in Table 2 .
This time period and frequency range overlapped with retrieval-associated phase clustering in both MTL ROIs and the dlPFC, and these effects predicted individual memory performance (see Fig 6 ; although dlPFC-Hip connectivity only yielded marginal significance r = .74; p = .06; n = 7).
The formula milk group also showed a marginal significance in Shannon diversity, with higher diversity observed (adjusted beta coefficient = 0.4, 95 % CI = −0.01–0.82, p = 0.06, Table 2 ).
Controlling for MF_04 did not eliminate the moderation effect in the state anxiety model: the SA × MF_EF interaction remained statistically significant (B = 0.16, SE = 0.08, p =.045), whereas the corresponding interaction in the trait anxiety model was attenuated to marginal significance (B = 0.12, SE = 0.07, p =.060; Supplementary Table S4_4; Fig.
A statistically significant difference was observed in TC ( p = 0.025) and LDL ( p = 0.04) levels, with TGs showing marginal significance ( p = 0.06).
However, when adjusting for body weight and kit, only rebound jump height remained predictive with marginal significance ( p = 0.06) ( R 2 = 0.45, p = 0.008).
Post hoc comparisons revealed that normalized N100 amplitudes in the 1% and 5% formalin groups were significantly larger than those in the NS and NT groups for any post-injection session ( p < 0.05 for all comparisons except for the marginal significance ( p = 0.06) between 1% formalin and NS groups during the 20–50 min interval after injection).
2 , the risk of post-transplant bacteremia is greater in patients who received autologous blood positive at bacteria than in patients who received autologous blood negative at bacteria with marginal significance (30.0% [3/10] vs. 5.0% [1/20], OR: 8.14, 95% CI: -2/08, 4.08, P = 0.06).
Nevertheless, the second study only enrolled 29 GBM patients and the comparison performed by log-rank test showed marginal significance ( P = 0.06).
Among other factors with marginal significance CD4 T-cell count (β = −0.21, P = 0.06) and age (β = −0.20, P = 0.06) were noted ( Table 3 ).
T1‐2: HR: 5.36, 95% CI: 0.60–47.91), MPB‐T classification only reached a marginal significance for prognosis prediction ( p = 0.06) (Table 4 ). 4.
In addition, distribution of differentiation tended to differ by the SNP with a marginal significance ( P = 0.06, extended Fisher’s exact test).
Regarding DFS ( Figure 4C ), medium vs low HE4 tertiles was significantly correlated with decreased DFS ( P =0.04), whereas the difference between high and low HE4 tertiles showed a marginal significance ( P =0.06).
TE insertion showed marginal significance on LRFS ( P = 0.06).
In K–M curves (Supplementary Figure 6), this trend demonstrated marginal significance ( P = 0.06).
T-tests on mean percentage of CRs acquired block by block confirmed significant differences between blocks 1 and 3 (p = 0.01), blocks 1 and 4 (p = 0.001), blocks 1 and 6 (p = 0.002), and marginal significance between blocks 1 and 5 (p = 0.06) during delay conditioning.
Only 32 variants (7 BRCA1 and 25 BRCA2 ) were present in both cases and controls and these were analyzed for association with breast cancer risk (Tables 2 and 3 ). In the single-variant association testing using logistic regression, BRCA1 p.Arg762Ser was associated with breast cancer risk with a marginal significance (OR = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.9–62.3; p = 0.06) (Additional file 2 : Figure S1).
In multiple linear regression analyses, femoral neck BMD had a significant positive association with eGFR ( P = 0.012), lumbar spine and proximal total femur BMD had a marginal significance ( P = 0.060 and P = 0.079, respectively), whereas, trochanteric BMD was not associated with eGFR ( P = 0.422) (data not shown).
Faculty ratings varied at a marginal significance level according to experimental group ( F = 2.89, p < 0.06).
Only the SRC-2 gene demonstrated a marginal significance for the diagnostic performance of high-risk PCa, with an AUC of 0.59 (95% CI 0.498–0.696; p = 0.060; Supplementary Material 4A).
In particular, the HR comparison reached significance ( P = .009) at i3, and marginal significance ( P = .06) at i1, with higher values for the IG.
Tissue fraction showed marginal significance ( p = 0.06), suggesting that its variable composition can influence efficiency under certain operating conditions.
Exposure Comparison Across Food Categories and Subpopulations The difference in dietary exposure levels across food groups showed marginal significance for both 3-MCPDE (ꭓ 2KW : 13.82, p = 0.06) and GE (ꭓ 2KW : 12.86, p = 0.07) for the total population.