Barely Significant
← all phrases

marginal significance

3,114 sentences · 3,114 papers · 6,631 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.07

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginal significanceP = 0.061.2× alphagold
Idarubicin group had more CR rate than daunorubicin group with marginal significance ( P = 0.06, see Table 2 ). 4 NR patients after first course of induction didn’t undergo the second course of chemotherapy and were unevaluable if they are chemotherapy refractory or not. 2 of them died of serious infections post chemotherapy and other 2 of them was bridged to transplantation directly.
marginal significancep =.0601.2× alphagold
Controlling for MF_04 did not eliminate the moderation effect in the state anxiety model: the SA × MF_EF interaction remained statistically significant (B = 0.16, SE = 0.08, p =.045), whereas the corresponding interaction in the trait anxiety model was attenuated to marginal significance (B = 0.12, SE = 0.07, p =.060; Supplementary Table S4_4; Fig.
marginal significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
Post hoc comparisons revealed that normalized N100 amplitudes in the 1% and 5% formalin groups were significantly larger than those in the NS and NT groups for any post-injection session ( p < 0.05 for all comparisons except for the marginal significance ( p = 0.06) between 1% formalin and NS groups during the 20–50 min interval after injection).
marginal significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
Only 32 variants (7 BRCA1 and 25 BRCA2 ) were present in both cases and controls and these were analyzed for association with breast cancer risk (Tables 2 and 3 ). In the single-variant association testing using logistic regression, BRCA1 p.Arg762Ser was associated with breast cancer risk with a marginal significance (OR = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.9–62.3; p = 0.06) (Additional file 2 : Figure S1).
marginal significanceP = 0.0601.2× alphagold
In multiple linear regression analyses, femoral neck BMD had a significant positive association with eGFR ( P = 0.012), lumbar spine and proximal total femur BMD had a marginal significance ( P = 0.060 and P = 0.079, respectively), whereas, trochanteric BMD was not associated with eGFR ( P = 0.422) (data not shown).