The interaction of leaf level and treatment was marginally significant (P = 0.0488; F = 3.19; dfnum = 3; dfden = 18).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
A marginally significant temporal trend of ASRIC was observed in urban areas (APC = 8.5%, 95% CI = 0.0 to 17.6%, P = 0.049).
The 3-month negative-conversion rate was 52% (14/27) in the FMT group, and 24% (5/21) in the control group, showing a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.049) ( Figure 2 ).
marginally non-significantp -value = 0.049
Moreover, organizational commitment switched from marginally non-significant to marginally significant ( p -value = 0.049) in the regression related to CS, and perceived risks for the future turned out as significant in the regression on CF ( p -value = 0.021).
The total effect of TNF-alpha on depressive symptoms was significant (c = 6.32, SE = 1.84, t = 3.44, p = 0.001), when controlling for PHQ-15, the direct effect remained marginally significant (c' = 2.99, SE = 1.50, t = 1.99, p = 0.049), suggesting a partial mediation of PHQ-15 ( figure 2 ).
We observed a marginally significant ( P = .049) short-term (2015, 85.9% vs 2018, 73.9%) decline in SNAP participation among convenience stores but no significant short-term changes in FFV availability among either SNAP or non-SNAP vendors.
We observed a marginally significant poorer survival rate in astrocytoma patients who expressed high levels of NR_002809 (p = 0.049, Fig 3A ), and low levels of BC002811 (p = 0.026, Fig 3B ) and XLOC_010967 (p = 0.024, Fig 3C ).
Regarding the activities performed outside of professional activity, the Chi-square test showed a marginally significant trend in caregiving ( p = 0.049) and participation in household activities ( p = 0.025), both more frequently reported in the Imagery sector.
Results: We found a marginally significant association between ADRB3 gene Trp64Arg polymorphism and EH in the whole population under the additive genetic model (OR: 1.200, 95% CI: 1.00–1.43, P = 0.049).
Similarly, the variation of task performance (computed as standard deviation across the 64 movement conditions) showed a trend of reduced variation after training (negative change values in Table 2 ), which was marginally significant only in the case of the end-error measures (F (1,14) = 4.66, p = 0.049, partial η 2 = 0.25).
Host category explained a modest proportion of the variation in community structure (R2 = 0.39) and showed a marginally significant effect (F = 1.580, p = 0.049), whereas host weight (R2 = 0.13, F = 1.061, p = 0.337) and sex (R2 = 0.09, F = 0.748, p = 0.774) were not significantly associated with microbial composition (Table 3 ).
However, as shown in Table 5 , the univariate score test revealed a marginally significant difference for path a (CTQ_CPEA → BPQ; χ 2 (1) = 3.880, p = 0.049), indicating a potential gender-specific variation in how childhood trauma relates to autonomic reactivity.
Mixed-model regression analyses revealed no significant interaction between group and delay [X 2 (2) = 0.538, P = 0.76], and a marginally significant effect of delay across all animals, both lesioned and controls, [X 2 (1) = 3.866, P = 0.049].
There was a marginally significant effect of age on whole liver LAMP2A levels (p = 0.049 by a main-effects model 2-way ANOVA; the interaction term was not significant in the full model).
The analysis revealed a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age at onset ( p = 0.001) and a marginally significant difference in elevated liver enzyme levels ( p = 0.049).
The SWOG 0226 phase III trial showed a significant improvement in PFS (15 versus 13.5 months; p = 0.007) and marginally significant OS (47.7 months versus 41.3 months; p = 0.049) in favour of fulvestrant plus anastrozole, despite the use of a dose of fulvestrant below the current standard.
A marginally significant trend was found for age, with students aged 25 years or above 25 years having higher median NK scores compared to their younger counterparts ( P = 0·049); however, no significant differences were found for the level of knowledge within each group.
The trial demonstrated a marginally significant reduction in the risk of relapse compared with GC alone (relapse-free survival rate at 12 months: 48% vs 31%; p=0.049) and a longer median duration of remission (9.9 months vs 3.9 months; p=0.023), without increased toxicity.
However, there was a marginally significant negative correlation between the CSHQ score and the cognitive scores of the children ( r(195) = -0.14, p = 0.049), indicating that parent reported sleep disturbances explained almost 2% of the variance in cognitive scores across children.
There was also a marginally significant association between patient age and CD44 expression (p = 0.049).
In patients with Crohn's disease, a marginally significant change in median (IQR) CRP concentration (g/L) was observed between baseline [4.0 (2.0–6.8)] and last follow-up [3.2 (1.0–4.7), p = 0.049, n = 47], whilst CRP decreased from 3.8 (1.0–5.0) to 2.2 (1.0–4.0) in patients with ulcerative colitis ( p = 0.02, n = 48).
At the within group level, OXY levels of control individuals showed a marginally significant increase from the Day 0 of sampling until the Day 19 ( t 1,93.5 = −3.107; p = 0.049; Figure 3C ), a decrease from 19 to 47 days under DR ( t 1,92.6 = −3.944, p = 0.004), and did not change from the end of DR until the end of the experiment, that is, from 47 to 62 days ( t 1,93.5 = −0.445, p = 1.000).
Post-hoc analyses revealed a Saccade task by Group interaction at the Cz electrode ( F (1, 35) = 5.09, MSE = 0.597, p < .05, η 2 p = .127), indicating that the PSP effect was present in monolinguals ( t (18) = 6.14, p < .001) but not in bilinguals ( t (17) = 1.41, p = .177), and, moreover, that monolinguals showed a marginally significant reduced PSP amplitude compared to bilinguals in antisaccades ( t (35) = 2.04, p = .049), but not in prosaccades ( t (35) = 0.76, p = .453).
There was a marginally significant trend for lower survival after infection in kri -flies ( n = 111 GOI and 177 control, Line effect p = 0.049, Table 1 , Figure 2 a).
However, the main effect of Group became marginally significant when all participants were analysed ( F (1, 41) = 4.12, p = .049, η p 2 = .09), with the NW group giving slightly higher overall ratings than the OW group.