“marginally significant”

However, there was a marginally significant negative correlation between the CSHQ score and the cognitive scores of the children ( r(195) = -0.14, p = 0.049), indicating that parent reported sleep disturbances explained almost 2% of the variance in cognitive scores across children.

In the comparison of the Backward Speech and No Speech condition, however, due to an overall increased pupil size in the Backward Speech condition we found a significant main effect of Language [ F (1, 23) = 6.629, p = 0.017, η 2 = 0.224], and only a marginally significant interaction of Language and Gaze [ F (1, 23) = 4.336, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.159].

Pre-operative findings Primary outcomes The bivariate association test of pre-operative PNIF and RMR values showed a marginally significant negative correlation (r = – 0.218, p = 0.049).

There was also a marginally significant association between patient age and CD44 expression (p = 0.049).

The coefficient for the Duration was marginally significant ( p = 0.049), while the coefficients for Distance and Speed were not statistically significant.

Our study found that the MIS group had a marginally significant difference than the OT group in the R0 resection rate [OR = 1.22, 95% CI (1.00, 1.50), P = 0.049].

In addition, the interaction of perceptual load × group was marginally significant [ F (2, 76) = 3.368, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.081].

There was a marginally significant difference in proportions of females that paired with different types of males ( X 2 = 6.014, df = 2, p = 0.049): the females of both subspecies were more likely to pair with Amur wagtail males, while intermediate females were more likely to pair with Black-backed Wagtail males.

A marginally significant interaction effect was found for the interaction of Time × Agent [ F (1,22) = 4.35, p = 0.049], but no significant main effect of Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.49, p = 0.491] and no significant interaction effects of Advice × Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.10, p = 0.758], Advice × Time [ F (1,22) = 0.07, p = 0.798], and Advice × Time × Agent [ F (1,22) = 0.06, p = 0.811] were found.

Marginally significant difference in DFS between the 6-month therapy group and the surgery alone group was observed in the multivariable analysis (HR=3.02, 95%CI, 1.00 to 9.07; P=0.049).

The results revealed that plasma manganese concentrations showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.049) in the PC group compared to BPH and PL, suggesting a potential, but inconclusive role in prostate cancer progression.

The duodenal V33 Gy showed a marginally significant difference ( p -value = 0.049) between ground truth and plan recalculation.

Although number of AGGs was marginally significant ( p = 0.0490), the overall variance explained by this model was similar to Model 1.

These results were further confirmed by a linear mixed-effects ANOVA ( S1Table ), in which the epoch x inactivation interaction was marginally significant in the high-gamma band ( p = 0.049) with no other significant main or interaction effects (all other p > 0.05).

A marginally significant difference was observed for anxiety at week 16 ( p = 0.049), favouring PORTAL ( Table 3 ).

The difference of the effect of average variability on choice consistency and confidence ratings is marginally significant (Δ β cons−conf = −0.39 ± 0.24, P = 0.049; Fig. 1 d), however, this effect becomes more pronounced when removing two participants with outlying confidence rating behavior (Δ β cons−conf = −0.53 ± 0.25, P = 0.02; Fig. 1 d and Supplementary Figs. 1 and 3 ).

There was a marginally significant effect of ROI on baseline alpha activity F (3, 66) = 3.583, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.140 ( Figure 5 ).

Tooth type showed a marginally significant difference ( P = 0.049), however, prior studies found it unrelated to postoperative pain, with only preoperative symptoms being predictive [ 2 ].

The difference was found to be marginally significant by the exact test (exact two-sided significance, P =0.049).

Notably, in our study, the WAnT C condition showed a marginally significant advantage over the WAnT P condition in terms of RPM max ( p = 0.049) and AvPO ( p = 0.042), while PPO, POmin, and tPPO values remained similar.

The corresponding mRS change score difference at 3 months was marginally significant (p = 0.049).

The total effect of TNF-alpha on depressive symptoms was significant (c = 6.32, SE = 1.84, t = 3.44, p = 0.001), when controlling for PHQ-15, the direct effect remained marginally significant (c' = 2.99, SE = 1.50, t = 1.99, p = 0.049), suggesting a partial mediation of PHQ-15 ( figure 2 ).

viciae was lower when the symbiont was present, a marginally significant difference ( Z = −1.96, P = 0.049; Table S2; Fig. 4 ).

By contrast, the effect of geographic location (island) was marginally significant ( R 2 = 1.91, p = 0.049), with the interaction between antibiotic status and island again identified as significant ( R 2 = 2.8305, p = 0.013).

However, post‐hoc analysis showed that only when using a more relaxed test such as the Tukey HSD, then a marginally significant difference between the inhibition and equality groups could be identified ( p = 0.049).