“marginally significant”

Results A positive/negative or suspected history of COVID-19 infection had marginally significant relationship with marital satisfaction (p=0.049).

Although the Kruskal-Wallis test showed a marginally significant p CO 2 effect (p = 0.049; Table 2 ), the pairwise Dunn post-hoc test did not detect significant differences between the three p CO 2 treatments (p > 0.05).

There was a small and marginally significant improvement in insulin sensitivity with red meat intake in individuals with T2D (SMD: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.57; P = 0.049) compared to those consuming less red meat.

However, a marginally significant improvement in BCSS was seen in patients receiving adjuvant therapy compared to NACT (log-rank test, p = 0.049).

Wound infection was more common in right-sided cases at a marginally significant level ( P = 0.049).

Still, there was a marginally significant preference after a day (mean AUC = 0.51, t (82) = 1.99, p = 0.049), which did not remain significant after false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted p = 0.056, q < 0.05).

We found no significant effects, except “eigen-centrality” for male–male connections having a marginally significant positive effect on the number of partners (GLM type II F-test, P = 0.049), suggesting that male dominance status affects female choice.

There was a significant interaction ROI x hemisphere for hand and foot patterns (left foot pattern: F [2,198] = 16.55, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.143; right foot pattern: F [2,198] = 11.98, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.108; left hand pattern: F [2,198] = 3.80, p = 0.024, η p 2 = 0.037; and right hand pattern: F [2,198] = 34.88, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.261), while a marginally significant effect was found for the tongue pattern ( F [2,198] = 3.05, p = 0.049, η p 2 = 0.030).

However, in terms of serum levels of autoantibodies, the only anti-PAIP2 autoantibody exhibited marginally significant difference ( p = 0.049) in autoantibody levels between ApoE4 and non-ApoE4 carriers (Supplementary Tables 6 and 7 ).

The difference of the effect of average variability on choice consistency and confidence ratings is marginally significant (Δ β cons−conf = −0.39 ± 0.24, P = 0.049; Fig. 1 d), however, this effect becomes more pronounced when removing two participants with outlying confidence rating behavior (Δ β cons−conf = −0.53 ± 0.25, P = 0.02; Fig. 1 d and Supplementary Figs. 1 and 3 ).

There was a marginally significant main effect with a medium effect size [F(1, 66) = 4.02, p = 0.049, η 2 = 0.050; p bonf = 0.008] ( Figure 3 ).

The equivalent RT analysis using correct trials revealed a main effect of “Group,” F (1,8) = 5.44, P = 0.048, and only a marginally significant “Group × Delay” interaction, F (4,32) = 5.40, P = 0.049.

The comparison of the normalized PA intensities among cholesterol polyps, adenomas, and adenocarcinomas demonstrated marginally significant differences at 765 nm (median, 0.67 vs. 0.66 vs. 0.78, respectively; p = 0.049).

We also observed a marginally significant ( p = 0.049) association between increased processing speed and protective odds for dyslexia (OR 0.95; 95% 0.89–1.00) compared to typical readers.

Mixed-model regression analyses revealed no significant interaction between group and delay [X 2 (2) = 0.538, P = 0.76], and a marginally significant effect of delay across all animals, both lesioned and controls, [X 2 (1) = 3.866, P = 0.049].

Furthermore, this study found that satisfaction with the department had a marginally significant negative predictive effect on POF ( β = −0.099, p = 0.049).

There was a marginally significant difference between the groups (p = 0.049).

A marginally significant difference was observed for anxiety at week 16 ( p = 0.049), favouring PORTAL ( Table 3 ).

Similar results were observed in the PP population, with the exception of the sural nerve where the NCV increase was marginally significant ( p = 0.049 FREMS vs placebo) (Table 2 , ESM Fig. 2 ).

These results were further confirmed by a linear mixed-effects ANOVA ( S1Table ), in which the epoch x inactivation interaction was marginally significant in the high-gamma band ( p = 0.049) with no other significant main or interaction effects (all other p > 0.05).

There was also a marginally significant association between patient age and CD44 expression (p = 0.049).

Exercise did not affect HDL-cholesterol concentration ( p = 0.913), but calorie restriction caused a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.049); however, none of the pairwise contrasts against the control trial reached significance ( Table 2 ).

By contrast, the effect of geographic location (island) was marginally significant ( R 2 = 1.91, p = 0.049), with the interaction between antibiotic status and island again identified as significant ( R 2 = 2.8305, p = 0.013).

The CSF concentration ratio of Aβ 42 to Aβ 40 showed only a marginally significant ( p = 0.049), age-related increase ( Figure 1D ).

Perceptual thresholds for detecting coherent motion (the minimum coherence level guaranteeing 80% accuracy) were higher (lower performance level) in patients than in controls [controls: 25.05 ( SD = 16.05), patients: 43.25( SD = 36.06)]; the group difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.049, Cohen's d = 0.65).