Barely Significant
← all phrases

nominally significant

7,733 sentences · 7,733 papers · 9,414 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.08

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

nominally significantp<0.051.0× alphagold
More specifically, out of 4,350,741 SNPs that indicated no heterogeneity between studies, those 185,986 SNPs that were nominally significant (p<0.05) and showed the same effect direction in all three studies were considered for the pathway enrichment analysis.
nominally significantp<0.051.0× alphagold
While on the whole, none of the cis -SNPs were genome-wide significant in the GWAS data, they were significantly enriched for nominally significant (p<0.05) SNPs in the BMI GWAS results ( [65] , binomial p = 0.007), indicating either their pleiotropic effect, or metabolic trait regulation through small RNA expression levels. rs2440129 was nominally significant in the BMI GWAS lookup [65] , while mir-195-3p was significantly associated with both rs2440129 in cis (FDR<5%, p<2.4×10 −5 ), as well as BMI (FDR<5%, p<3.9×10 −3 ) and PTFM (FDR<5%, p<4.1×10 −3 ), suggesting a mechanism for the rs2440129 association.
nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
Despite the much narrower range of ages in this cohort, nine (29.03%) of the 31 transcripts for which data were available displayed a nominally significant ( P < 0.05) association between transcript abundance and brain development (Supplemental Table 2), with several transcripts showing highly significant associations with developmental age (Supplemental Fig. 3).
nominally significantP <0.051.0× alphagold
Results Allelic associations The European Caucasian sample set revealed nominally significant ( P <0.05) associations with gout at two block-3 SNPs: rs475688 and rs7932775 (SLC22A12; OR = 1.26, P = 0.043; OR = 1.32, P = 0.033, respectively) (Table 1 ).
nominally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
To underpin this, we further checked the directions of effect of all nominally significant a-DMSs ( P < 0.05) and found that methylation changes tended to be negatively associated with maternal smoking between 0 and 4/5 years (Fig. 4b ) and, moreover, that 721/971 (74.2%) a-DMSs showed a stronger decrease in methylation levels from 0 to 4/5 years (Additional file 1 : Table S7).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
To ensure a sufficiently large sampling distribution, we restricted our analysis to six nominally significant ( p < 0.05 952 ≈ 5.25 × 10 − 5 ) gene-trait combinations with at least 10 individuals who are either CH variant carriers or with ≥2 pLoF or damaging missense/protein-altering variants on the same haplotype ( STAR Methods ).
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
If one is interested in filtering a large list of nominally significant findings (p < 0.05) to identify a subset most worthy of follow-up, instead of characterizing the evidence for a single finding, our flexible scoring system can be utilized in this setting as well.
nominally significantp < 0.051.0× alphagold
Nevertheless, in the Breslow–Day test, we detected that only two (rs72854462 and rs1438898 mapped to TEX41 gene) of the 821 tested SNPs were nominally significant ( p < 0.05), signaling heterogeneity in the odds ratios (OR) of these variants between Mexico and Colombia (see Supplementary Table 3 ).
nominally significantp value < 0.051.0× alphagold
Among these CpGs, 129 were nominally significant ( p value < 0.05) in at least one of our models (total number of ACEs: 14 CpGs; total number of ACEs categorical, 1–3 vs. 0: 8 CpGs; 4–10 vs. 0: 12 CpGs; 4–10 vs. 1–3: 15 CpGs; mutually adjusted, emotional abuse: 13 CpGs; physical abuse: 11 CpGs; sexual abuse: 11 CpGs; emotional neglect: 19 CpGs; physical neglect: 10 CpGs; domestic violence: 15 CpGs; substance abuse: 20 CpGs; mental illness: 23 CpGs; incarceration: 13 CpGs; divorce: 9 CpGs), although none remained significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons in our EWAS (Additional file 2 : Table S1).