Barely Significant
← all phrases

“showed a trend”

53,323 sentences · 53,323 papers · 65,371 search hits before verification

In the literature

Additionally, patients with persistently negative EBV-DNA showed a trend toward improved survival compared with those who converted from negative to positive, and patients who achieved viral clearance (positive to negative) also tended to have better outcomes than those with persistent positivity; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance.
did not reach statistical significanceP = 0.0601.2× alphaplainly factual
Additionally, sigmoid colon tumors showed a trend towards increased mortality risk compared to other colon locations, though this did not reach statistical significance (aHR = 1.50, 95% CI: 0.98–2.28, P = 0.060) ( Table 5 ). 3.7 Survival curve analysis Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among the four subgroups defined by VFA and blood lipid levels.
In the laparoscopic hysterectomy subgroup, the QL block showed a trend of superiority over TAP (MD 443.15; 95% CI, 56.37, to 829.93, I 2 = 98%; GRADE evidence: high) and OSTAP block (MD 120.00; 95% CI, 51.46 to 188.54, I 2 = NA; GRADE evidence: moderate); however, no significant difference was present compared to placebo (MD 169.26; 95% CI, −59.48, to 398.00, I 2 = 99%; GRADE evidence: low) and ESP block (MD ‐20.00; 95% CI, −194.79, to 154.79, I 2 = NA; GRADE evidence: moderate) (Figure 2 ).
Dose-limiting toxicities Pharmacokinetics & pharmacodynamics In the dose-escalation phase, after a single dose, Cmax increased approximately proportionally with dose, whereas AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ showed a trend toward greater-than-dose-proportional increases ( Figure 1A and B ), noting the variability and the limited sample size within each dose cohort.